Many of our new players have come from that division. So, the difference between the two are incalculable... But I'm off to Gateshead soon so will let you know if there are any significant differences in the standard [QUOTE]
Printable View
Incalculable? Ok.
Not sure why we bother with having different leagues and league tables seeing as it's incalculable.
Safe travels and give them a cheer for me, but make sure you don't fall into the trap of making a premature judgement and a definitive statement based on just 90 mins of football.
Of the 320 non-league clubs in steps 1-4 Notts currently have the 3rd highest ELO rating. Fylde actually have the joint highest 'Step 2' rating with Brackley Town which puts them 16th highest.
1. Solihull - 1884
2. Wrexham - 1868
3. Notts - 1850
- - - - - - - - - - - -
13. Gateshead - 1757
16. AFC Fylde - 1708
16. Brackley Town - 1708
A description of what ELO ratings are can be found here . . . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_...ll_Elo_Ratings
Spot on, anything else is nuts.
And for what? To accommodate Adam Chicksen as our dashing, left winger? The sooner we have Scott alongside Langstaff the better.
Chicks should get zero criticism for anything connected to playing left wing-back btw. He's an excellent defensive player. It's just ridiculous to me that the coaching staff ask him to carry the attack for us down the left.
Well having witnessed that load of rubbish, i think its fair to say that on the night the ex Conference North outfit were better than our established prima donna side....Unfortunately after listening to the managers after match comments, i wondered what game he was watching. Very concerning......