Trouble with him is that he doesn't shoot from distance, he only ever scores closeup.Quote:
Originally Posted by SwalePie
Printable View
Trouble with him is that he doesn't shoot from distance, he only ever scores closeup.Quote:
Originally Posted by SwalePie
I know silence is golden..! But has anyone considered it could be Nemane...!!Quote:
Originally Posted by SwalePie
You do understand the DM role right ?Quote:
Originally Posted by durhampie
It isnt to go charging about like an headless chicken vicating lots of space.
Energy aka as runs around doing nothing seen it so many times.
Bostock is better than Vincent his career shows this.
Burchnall/Williams dont rate him much both wrong ?
Stop talking sense. It’s like the Michael Doyle conundrum of a couple of years ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by legs77
Frank Vincent might get a sniff this weekend with no Ruben.
We could go 4-2-3-1 which would pin back Chesterfields wingbacks IMO
I’d like to see
Slocombe
TAR. Connell. Baldwin. Cameron
Bostock. Palmer.
Nemane. Scott. JJ
Macca
Harsh on Chicksen who could swap with Cameron but would prefer an out and out attacking quartet
No chance we’re switching formations haha. Eight pick themselves tomorrow (assuming Brindley is still out) - Slocombe, Rawlinson, Baldwin, Cameron, Nemane, Chicksen, Palmer and Langstaff.Quote:
Originally Posted by Notts78
The remaining three could be any combination of Bostock, O’Brien, Austin, Jones and Scott depending on what LW thinks will most hurt Chesterfield.
Seeing as we're top o' the league n'all - Let's Hang On, eh?Quote:
Originally Posted by SwalePie
Its a matter of opinion. JB has had 13 clubs in roughly the same amount of years, which suggests to me that he wasn't required to stay any longer at those clubs (apart from Donny). By comparison, Vincent is much younger so you cant really compare the two. As far as Birchnall goes, then i didnt rate him either. As for LW, then JB was more than likely his signing, so that's why he may get the nod over others. That's just my theory. O:)Quote:
Originally Posted by legs77
Why does it suggest he wasn’t required? 4 or 5 were loans at spurs till he left. On that podcast at least 2 of his moves were proactive whilst abroad then he went to Forest from Toulouse as his son was unwell and wanted to be in the uk. I think he’s just taken a different football approach due to early football/life experiences. When you have it in for a player Durham there’s absolutely no wriggle room to give them any credit.Quote:
Originally Posted by durhampie
He hasn't done anything that suggests he deserves a starting place. When he does then I will applaud him. To date he has only had one decent display as second half sub.
Well you blamed him for us drawing twice but yet since and before he’s been in winning sides.Quote:
Originally Posted by durhampie
It’s one thing having a view but it’s another fabricating/guessing negatively what’s happened, old LW mate (he wasn’t), LWs signing (based on what) and rejected by all his other clubs (based on what) especially after he gave a full walk through of his career, he seems an honest guy.