Is it not the case each member of the public made a deal with Gov to stick to the regulations?
Printable View
It's about two journeys that collectively posed minimal risk to the public. Should he have made them? Certainly not the second. Is it worth the politically motivated feeding frenzy? Not in my opinion. There are people dieing and this is what we want to talk about?
Pathetic.
As for dishonesty, as I pointed out earlier, I think it is now endemic in British politics. Remember how you slavishly adopted the 'evolving' excuses put out by Corbyn's team as they tried to excuse his support for an anti-Semitic mural? I do.
Kerr said
As for dishonesty, as I pointed out earlier, I think it is now endemic in British politics. Remember how you slavishly adopted the 'evolving' excuses put out by Corbyn's team as they tried to excuse his support for an anti-Semitic mural? I do.
Is there something wrong with you wanting to bring Corbyn into this for as you say & I quote " There are people dying and this is what we want to talk about? "
You total plonker & hypocrite & all in one post
If anyone's pathetic it's you
Don't ask dumb questions and I won't have to respond in kind. Deal with the public?
Good grief.
I think people chose to abide by the rules for a number of reasons.
The reaction to schools being reopened suggests that many people are doing it for the well being and safety of themselves and their families, which, on the face of it was the motivation for Cumming's decision to drive to Durham. For some it will be because they have got the (mathematical) message that reducing the transmission rate is important in order to protect the NHS from being overwhelmed. For others it might be through peer pressure or a fear of being fined. It's probably a combination of factors.