ha ha ok mate cheers
Printable View
ha ha ok mate cheers
Its the boy who said Shankland deal was 'done' a full month before he signed. Now I dont think Shankland knew the deal was done a month before it was. And that is what he is basing his credibility on.
Nisbet or Safranko.????
Hmmm, the former for me please. Liked Pav but players coming back rarely works out.
rarely works out agree but he was on loan and not technically oor player, plus hes the polar opposite to lazy so you ken you're getting 110% effort
F*ck it, sign them both.
RTQuote:
Originally Posted by tHeArAb
Safranko is a no from me.
Didn't think he was anything special when he was here 1st time around.
The season we finished 3rd and won the cup. The strikers we had on the books (and all played a part/scored) were:Quote:
Originally Posted by tHeArAb
Daly, Goodie, Cadamarteri, Casalinuovo, Shala, Sandaza.
6 strikers!
So far we have Shanks, Clark and Appere. And you could argue Clark isnt even an out and out striker? The more the merrier for me! Canna see us paying for both though...
What were you watching mate? 😂 f ucking hell he was our best player by a mile throughout the entire season. Neilson should have been lynched for playing Sow ahead of him in the play off 1st leg.Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitfieldarab
He was a good player, in a sh*te team, in the wrong formation, forever isolated up front on his own. F*ck, he was even shunted into the no.10 role at times by a clueless manager. When we appoint Mackay who favours 4-4-2, him & Shankland would be a class partnership.