COUTTS out of the derby?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GrayBlade

Yep. It was never a penalty, he made a meal of it like he'd done all game and then he used the incident to waste even more time.

---

Thats the point at which the ref should have grown a pair and made both him and the trainer walk off at the closest point to the 'offence' not meander their way down the pitch like they did. A Red card at that point might have help change his/their attitude.

Nid.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BlockD

Never in doubt,what's the next thing some of our fans going to be getting their knickers about before Sunday I wonder?

---

The panel couldn't agree,so obviously there was some doubt ya duck egg.I'm delighted COUTTSY's available,Tufty will not be in't stands either,which is gr8 news also.UTCB

Well looks like Coutts is about to sack his window cleaner XD


http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p05gqxmr

I'm so relieved about this if they couldn't agree some of em must of thought it looked bad I'm just glad to be wrong again things beginning to look up lost my phone this morning retraced all my steps which included Rotherham hospital couldn't find it anywhere came home and went upstairs and found it on the bed (I can't even remember goin upstairs with it :s ) anyway it was good news finding it and getting it reinstated and this is also good news,might have a go on the lottery tonight ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Longshortandtall

No-one has said the referees couldn't agree. They didn't even discuss it. They were asked independently of each other for their view of the incident. All three could have said there was nothing in it for all we know and that is the more likely scenario. For Coutts to be charged all three would have had to say independent of each other it was a red card offence. They didn't. Process explained in attached.

http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/f...-what-11173785

---

Good idea that!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Longshortandtall

No-one has said the referees couldn't agree. They didn't even discuss it. They were asked independently of each other for their view of the incident. All three could have said there was nothing in it for all we know and that is the more likely scenario. For Coutts to be charged all three would have had to say independent of each other it was a red card offence. They didn't. Process explained in attached.

http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/f...-what-11173785

---

They couldn't agree a majority decision accordin to the piece i read..UTCB

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Longshortandtall

That'll be the piece that Shields wrote that was factually incorrect. They never agreed anything with anyone as they were asked for their own independent view.

---

I know they were asked independently,the point is that if 2 thought it was a red card incident and one didn't then obviously it wasn't unaminous,hence no action bein taken.It was Shields article i saw by the way,i shudda known summat was incorrect.UTCB