Crowds and McCabes incentive to back Wilder.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rodcurrie

Behave thissen Marvin,tha'll be gerrin called a *um Licker.I'm just suprised King Kev hasn't been blamed for COUTTSY's injury or FLECKY's suspension yet.UTCB

---

As far as I'm aware Rod, the Princes "promotion investment" hasn't arrived. Oddly enough he gets a pass while McCabe still gets pelters for past failures, on a daily basis. (When we were in the top two it calmed down a bit but though.......) .

To use hyperbole, it's akin to someone obsessively spying on their neighbours wife sunbathing topless in her own garden, with binoculars, from behind the upstairs curtains and then calling her a s l ut

It's not the best analogy but quality doesn't appear to be important on here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomytony

The fact that it was all fine a few weeks ago is why this period, JTW, is being scrutinised so closely now HC and the doubts/anticipation/questions asked are being expressed based on history and experience.

Are you saying it's time for the prince to step up to the plate?

---

It was much quieter a few weeks ago TT.

We all know about the promised investment in the team. What we don't know is when and how much. McCabe shouldn't take the blame for that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Carpe_diem

No it wasn't. At no point have I said 'yes, I'm happy with McCabe's continued running of the club'. I'm happy with how Tufty is running things, and disappointed by the recent run in form. I'm also saddened by the injury to Coutts, which has seemingly had a massive impact on the team's performances as a whole. Let me be clear: I want McCabe out. Getting one managerial appointment right hasn't magically wiped the slate clean for me. I'd prefer someone who has a bit more ambition, a bit more gumption, a bit more savvy and lot less spin.

Incidentally, conflating the issues of our first team management and our current stewardship is a bit flawed. They're two separate issues.

Finally, I don't know. If the Prince is proving to be shady, the blame - yet again - has to at least partially be set at McCabe's door, as he and he alone sold half the club to the Prince. It's nothing we as fans had anything to do with.

---

No balance there whatsoever. Find him one of these buyers everyone says is out there.

You want him out but have no idea how to solve that. None of us do.

By the way, I didn't say you said you were happy, don't start that. I said it had gone quiet. Which it had. That, is a fact. Now we're back on a daily repeat, like Dave on TV.

It's like some want McCabe to fail.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Holden_C

No balance there whatsoever. Find him one of these buyers everyone says is out there.

You want him out but have no idea how to solve that. None of us do.

By the way, I didn't say you said you were happy, don't start that. I said it had gone quiet. Which it had. That, is a fact. Now we're back on a daily repeat, like Dave on TV.

It's like some want McCabe to fail.

---

Aint that the truth Marvin,some i'm convinced have had their fingers crossed for King Kev to mess up and even if he dunt he's gunna get both barrels.I can't believe you aint been called a clapper or thick yet tho.;)Have a good day BLADES(True or otherwise)men&gals UTCB

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Holden_C

It was much quieter a few weeks ago TT.

We all know about the promised investment in the team. What we don't know is when and how much. McCabe shouldn't take the blame for that.

---

With the raised expectations of our swift progress the noise has increased and, as I have said, the issue is in much sharper focus because of it .

Also, as CD has said, the relatively calm waters do not absolve McC for the past but enough of that (!) for the moment.

I think McC gets the blame much of the time( guilty as charged) as the well known, recognisable figurehead of SUFC.

I don't really care who puts the money in, as long as it goes in, but the prince is now the one under the spotlight.

However, as a McC 'appointment' the two are inextricably linked.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomytony

With the raised expectations of our swift progress the noise has increased and, as I have said, the issue is in much sharper focus because of it .

Also, as CD has said, the relatively calm waters do not absolve McC for the past but enough of that (!) for the moment.

I think McC gets the blame much of the time( guilty as charged) as the well known, recognisable figurehead of SUFC.

I don't really care who puts the money in, as long as it goes in, but the prince is now the one under the spotlight.

However, as a McC 'appointment' the two are inextricably linked.

---

There's enough going on at the moment to be concerned about than going on and on and on about the past, as if no one else is aware or need reminding everyday. We don't, we are all fully aware, but being unable to grasp things that are current means some have to rely on the well documented past for internet validation (at least you have voted with your feet).

The sh1tty comments about Rod were pathetic, considering. And hypocritical, as if he can't have an opinion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Holden_C

There's enough going on at the moment to be concerned about than going on and on and on about the past, as if no one else is aware or need reminding everyday. We don't, we are all fully aware, but being unable to grasp things that are current means some have to rely on the well documented past for internet validation (at least you have voted with your feet).

The sh1tty comments about Rod were pathetic, considering. And hypocritical, as if he can't have an opinion.

---

Unfortunately, it's the past that shapes the future so it is of relevance particularly when based on experience and actions that have shaped the future.

He 's a big boy and is entitled to an opinion as is everyone else I agree

The fact that he cannot back it up with any sort of logic, reasoned argument or tailored ( to the question) response are summed up well by your word 'pathetic'.

The fact that he's now behaving like a child looking through the railings at the others playing should point out his pathetic need to be noticed.

It seems to me we would be possibly in the top 2 or close to them without the injuries and Fleck situation. None of this is
the fault of Mr McCabe. If we do go up then he shouldn't get the praise either.

CW will not break the bank even if he was offered more money to spend (up to the FFP limits).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Longshortandtall

The Princes Promotion investment hasn't arrived? Do you know something we don't? Genuine question?

McCabe has said there is a written agreement between the two parties but I doubt it says the Prince has to stump up all the cash on promotion. Its a 50/50 partnership and everything to date suggests they are equally funding the running costs after the Princes initial investment of £10 million over 3 years.

If the investment doesn't arrive and CW's quotes this morning to Giddings suggests it hasn't then aren't both partners equally to blame.

---

If you order something online you have a contract with the supplier. Legally binding. If it doesn't arrive, is it equally your fault?