Trust chair to stand down

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by offshore_arab83

No not responsible but it was public knowledge about their antics over in St Andrews plus the fact we were signing all these unknown donkeys so I would have though they, as the 3rd largest shareholder should have been saying ‘hold on and f ucking minute’ just the same as we all were

They have more ‘pull’ than your average punter and IMO could have and should have done more.

As far as Q&A’s are concerned, again, you need to be a member to find out anything or any stories, plus I’d wager the questions were agreed as it seems to be th way Mr A operates these days. If he doesn’t know what questions are coming his way the Q&A doesn’t go ahead

RE: standing for election, dare say you’d need to be a member to be considered eh, you need to be a member for absolutely everything trust related

---

good points there OA

End of the day they have a guy on the actual board at Tannadice, why didn’t he ask the questions we all were?

I think the work they do for the community and charity is second to none but I feel they let everyone down with not intervening when they could have. Just my opinion....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by offshore_arab83

No not responsible but it was public knowledge about their antics over in St Andrews plus the fact we were signing all these unknown donkeys so I would have though they, as the 3rd largest shareholder should have been saying ‘hold on and f ucking minute’ just the same as we all were

They have more ‘pull’ than your average punter and IMO could have and should have done more.

As far as Q&A’s are concerned, again, you need to be a member to find out anything or any stories, plus I’d wager the questions were agreed as it seems to be th way Mr A operates these days. If he doesn’t know what questions are coming his way the Q&A doesn’t go ahead

RE: standing for election, dare say you’d need to be a member to be considered eh, you need to be a member for absolutely everything trust related

---

Question 8 sees them questioning football governance.

As it is. I only remember the Jackie drink stuff being rumours. How come other fan groups didn't question it?

It's not always just the trust is it?

But they did actually ask serious questions no?

Forget the AD who is now a ST appointment after his term was up.

Look at the questions they asked.

Fyi. The fed rep asked about mixus contract which anyone would know could not be answered due to confidentiality.

What questions have the fed, dusf etc asked?

The support deserves truth not spin.

We need one fan group. I don't care who it is

Just get the egos away to **** and start with one from scratch.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PortugueseFrank

What questions have the fed, dusf etc asked?

The support deserves truth not spin.

We need one fan group. I don't care who it is

Just get the egos away to **** and start with one from scratch.

---

one fan group - collective i agree.

I would be up for starting this.

Egos from all groups won't allow.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PortugueseFrank

Egos from all groups won't allow.

---

time to think different

phuck the egos

anyone interested??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PortugueseFrank

But they did actually ask serious questions no?

Forget the AD who is now a ST appointment after his term was up.

Look at the questions they asked.

Fyi. The fed rep asked about mixus contract which anyone would know could not be answered due to confidentiality.

---

Correct, they asked the questions and were given a bull**** politicians response.

As the "3rd largest shareholder" what did they do to challenge the answers they received?

What have they done since this Q&A as the club has slipped to unprecedented lows??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Danny_Dyer

Correct, they asked the questions and were given a bull**** politicians response.

As the "3rd largest shareholder" what did they do to challenge the answers they received?

What have they done since this Q&A as the club has slipped to unprecedented lows??

---

As far as I'm aware, it was the Trust that obtained and released the information about JM's contract clause regarding sales of players.