nor me :oQuote:
Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier
Printable View
nor me :oQuote:
Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier
Have a quick listen to a survivor of the Nazi purge of Jews and refugees in WW2 mon ami. It's far from funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by sinkov
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...pinionuk_email
Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.
In addition, such manifestations could also target the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
Examples of the ways in which antisemitism manifests itself with regard to the State of Israel taking into account the overall context could include:
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).
Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.
Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries.
Published 30 March 2016
Where are the women / mums coming nbthese pictures BT - said on previous post you always find a way of bringing it back around to some tragic child’s death , when i and others are saying that immigration is out of control and most ( not all ) are coming here on the gravy train all young men , all coming for all the wrong reasons.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier
I know you won’t be reasoned with but our country imo anyway is under siege and not by genuine refugees, the whole thing is flawed and people like yourself ( no disrespect) are making it so no one dare even have an opinion.
Money doesn’t grow on trees ( my dad still says ) and yet you seem to think we can sustain and absorb all the criminals , illegal immigrants and fund it all while our own people - elderly - ex servicemen- homeless can’t get anything in the way - shape of support.
The whole thing is as you put it a **** show
I think the Met is a law unto itself (no pun intended) and is not respected by other police forces. Every force has its plonkers whereas the Met seems to have serial rapists and murderers, it's in a different league.
We simply cannot go on the way we are army88. We need intelligent solutions to the whole immigration crisis and Suella Braverman creaming her kecks at the thought of a plane setting off for Rwanda with 8 people on board is not one of them. :?Quote:
Originally Posted by army88
If you can be arsed to do a bit of research you will be amazed to discover that a lot of homeless people are homeless by choice and illegal immigrants don't unsettle them one bit.
The MOD in this country have thousands upon thousands of acres with properties contained within dotted throughout the UK, I'm at a loss why we don't use them. I know the rural locals always kick up a fuss because of NIMBYISM but like sinkov says, "feck 'em"!
We ankle tag UK bred alleged or convicted criminals for monitoring purposes, why not with asylum seekers?
Why does the Home Office keep farting about with asylum applications? FFS we have a World Wide Web, we have social media, we have Diplomatic Offices in every corner of the world, we have emails and diplomatic bags.
We have the largest Civil Service per capita in the western world, get the f*ckers to get their fingers out and process an application inside 4 weeks.
Application approved = Jobseekers Allowance and access to benefits.
Application denied = plane home to country of origin.
Brize Norton is full of RAF planes capable of a quick flight back to country of origin for failed asylum seekers. Braverman does not need to feed her cronies crumbs to book Virgin Atlantic flights to Kigali.
We need politicians with balls, not blaming illegal immigrants for their failures.
Would you risk this?
How bad is a person's lot to attempt this?
Attachment 23255
Suella Braverman was telling the House of Commons today the police are not fit for purpose (or something like that) and over 1000 policemen should be sacked on the spot (or something like that).Quote:
Originally Posted by kritichris
I think someone should tell her she's their boss and she ought to resign immediately. I know she's done that once but another resignation will be more than acceptable.
Attachment 23256
What does this mean ?Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier
If you can be arsed to do a bit of research you will be amazed to discover that a lot of homeless people are homeless by choice and illegal immigrants don't unsettle them one bit.
You really miss the point all the time BT , I’ll explain it for you , I don’t need to research regarding homeless people and I freely accept that some are by choice , but as with refugees perhaps some are genuine and some are not , really don’t care about being un settled.
The country is in a dire state , tags and mod properties are all well and good for Genuine refugee applications- but wait for it here’s the point most of them are not genuine , they are here on the take for all they can get out of our weak piss poor system, billions and billions wasted on housing and feeding these people plus the strain on resources to look after them.
Stop them coming at source and look after our people Me - you included in that, my children and grand children importantly as well be dead and gone when Great Britain is no longer Great.
‘Would you risk this ‘?
As always I keep saying as well they all want to risk it for a reason and the reason is we are the softest touch ever, hence firstly why they risk all to get here and secondly that why they Bypass other country’s to get to us.
I ask you every time BT where will the money come from to fund the immigration issues to sort the NHS , I appreciate your compassion for all but there comes a point where it’s not viable / possible to do everything we’d all like to.
If we had an efficient and effective Border Control and a Foreign Secretary who is not totally useless and could actually negotiate with the French we would not have any problem whatsoever army88.Quote:
Originally Posted by army88
But we don't, so our equally useless Chancellor of the Exchequer will have to keep stumping up because another hopeless Cabinet Member Suella Braverman has no solution to illegal immigration.
Not hard to see that the 13 years of a Tory government has produced the square root of f*ck all is it?
I’ll look forward with interest to see how Labour sort it BT , how they stop it and then of course how we pay for it . ( I’ve put the paying bit because it’s going to get a whole lot worse under a Labour government).Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier
There is no need to negotiate with the frogs , just stop them entering at the border and send em back before they get here
In a nutshell army88, the French are taking the pi$$ but we are too soft to stop it.Quote:
Originally Posted by army88
Sinkov's cover girl would, of that I have no doubt.
Attachment 23259