Sounds idyllic. What division would we playing in? Top flight?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark_Ross
Printable View
Sounds idyllic. What division would we playing in? Top flight?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark_Ross
From a simplistic view point, they are correct in that there are two biological ***es. There are inter*** people but from a biological point of view, they're not the norm and are a result of a developmental defect. More extreme cases aren't seen as they aren't viable fetuses and are sadly miscarried. Those that are born inter*** are almost always infertile due to the defect so from a biological point of view, they're correct, two ***es.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmiffyPie
To take this argument to a slightly different level, let's take a mule. The only reason a mule exists is because a human bred a female horse and a male donkey to create a mule. Both species have different numbers of chromosomes but because of biology, they can create a viable fetus that turns out to be a mule (fun fact, a male horse and female donkey creates a "Hinny" but this is much less likely to be viable). The mule can't breed itself and to make more mules, you need horses and donkeys so they exist but are not a species. In the same way inter*** people exist yet are not their own ***. Humans reproduce via two gametes fusing to create a new offspring. Humans produce only two viable gametes spermatozoa (male gamete) and the oocyte (female gamete). *** is about reproduction, inter*** people in this horrible analogy are mules, they exist, they're human but they produce neither *** gamete so sit in a grey area of developmental dysfunction biologically speaking. But the fact humans only have two gametes and you need one of each very much states there are only two ***es
Bit of a silly reply that has nothing to do with these minority people that want to pump beta blockers into innocent children,our children. Then again if you are under that umbrella its on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark_Ross
I think you mean puberty blockers. Beta blockers are generally used for heart conditions and a second line medication for GlaucomaQuote:
Originally Posted by The Dug Out
The regional Australia viewpoint is without a doubt the best.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1i739SyCu9I
Don't know what you mean?Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dug Out
My post was a bit of a knee jerk reaction (sorry) versus those people who seem to hate science & technology, but are more than happy to use the rewards, generally.
For example: Anti-evolution, anti-genetic engineering, anti-stem cell research, climate change deniers, young earthers, & so on.
"Fun fact, a male horse and female donkey creates a "Hinny" but this is much less likely to be viable."
I've read somewhere that the ancient Romans used to use both hybrids.
Mules can carry more weight, but hinnies have better stamina.
I don't get this whole argument. I like Men's football.
Sorry,yes i did mean puberty blockers, it was my mistake.It is an abomination to give young people these *** changing drugs & i have experieced what this does in a family circle, people who advocate it should be in prison along with those minority wierdos that support this abuse. I am all for advances in medical practice, mainly to get rid of deadly diseases, that is what mankind is excelling at, long may it continue, this other stuff is the whims of a few.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicken Balti Pie
Puberty blockers don't change someone's ***. But they can be of immense medical help, if given carefully and appropriately (and it is unfortunately true that that has not always been the case). They're helpful both to kids with precocious puberty and for kids with gender dysphoria.
Mankind is also getting better at understanding differences. Trans people exist. It's not a question of whim or decision or fetish. It is a question of how society tolerates them.