Mitchell leaving June 25

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jammy89

I do have to say, based on how Palace ran that deal against us. We agree at ?70 million and it would have changed again.

---

At the time I was under the impression that we did go to 70 and they said 75, which was when we walked away.

As soon as they'd sold Joachim Andersen on the 3rd of August it was clear Guehi was going nowhere. I don't know why they bothered to keep trying. I felt that was just a power trip by the pr!ck Parish, as it turned out to be.

Turns out a lot of that Craig Hope article was fairly accurate.

Mitchell rubbed a lot of people up the wrong way-very full of himself and thought he was above folk. Said an awful lot but did very little. Was hardly ever there, still lived in Manchester.

The feeling in the club is the opposite of what you might expect -him leaving is seen as a positive and appointing him was a misstep (in hindsight).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ragatino

At the time I was under the impression that we did go to 70 and they said 75, which was when we walked away.

As soon as they'd sold Joachim Andersen on the 3rd of August it was clear Guehi was going nowhere. I don't know why they bothered to keep trying. I felt that was just a power trip by the pr!ck Parish, as it turned out to be.

---

He was never going to be sold, even before Anderson, and Parish was taking the p!ss.

Glasner was on record just after the transfer window closed saying ?It was never really in doubt?.

But also, by that token, people can?t really blame Mitchell for a transfer that was never going to g to happen too.