500 transfer rumours that might need a taxi ordering...

You come across as too aggressive Trees , perhaps if you changed your attitude you'd get better responses from our lads fella.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Altobelli

You come across as too aggressive Trees , perhaps if you changed your attitude you'd get better responses from our lads fella.

---

I agree Alto. I think when you go away you should learn to be a little more moderate and willing to listen to others point of view.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds

Don't believe the price, they are guessing. It's just a rag.


I told I feared Boro more than you. Fact yes/no?
15m was turned down. Increased bid and 60 k a week

I also told you two years running that, Lansbury wouldn't sign for you. Fact yes/no?

You know **** all and the normal mouth pieces have gone quiet.

---

Hang on. You post a link to this "rag" to prove that you were right, then say they are guessing on the price. The part when they say that Burnley haven't come close to Boro's offer (which they are guessing) is accurate though?

Alright then :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds

a straight deal? Since when has BFC offered a straight deal? lol

---

In the last 12 months we've spent over £50m signing players from Anderlecht, Charlton, Derby, Norwich, Villa, Swansea, Stoke and Leeds. These clubs didn't seem to find dealing with us in any way problematic. If Forest do, maybe the problem's at your end ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds

I also told you two years running that, Lansbury wouldn't sign for you. Fact yes/no?

---

I don't think you'd recognise a fact if it fell from 500 ft and landed on the top of your head. I've already pointed out the facts about Lansbury. A fee was agreed, terms were agreed with the player, he was at Turf Moor about to sign when the Forest owner pulled the plug on the deal. If you're unaware of this you're by no means as well informed as you like to pretend.

Any further news on the Danny Ings rumours or state of his fitness?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CaspertheClaret

Any further news on the Danny Ings rumours or state of his fitness?

---

He hasn't travelled with the Liverpool squad on their preseason tour, or played any part in two friendlies last week. I think that's because of fitness, rather than any potential loan or transfer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by outwoodclaret

I agree Alto. I think when you go away you should learn to be a little more moderate and willing to listen to others point of view.

---

i come across as aggressive?

It amazes me in here, how folks assume that BFC want a player, he's coming?

It depends on many factors and sometimes, just sometimes. Those involved with a players club may just know a bit more.
I TOLD YOU WHAT I KNEW ABOUT LANSBURY
Even Tony was aggressive and others said it was a done deal?
I said no and it didn't happen.

Assombalonga, 8 million? No way .
I told you the price and that I feared Middlesborough more.

So exactly who was wrong and agressive here, considering all the abuse I have received?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sinkov

I don't think you'd recognise a fact if it fell from 500 ft and landed on the top of your head. I've already pointed out the facts about Lansbury. A fee was agreed, terms were agreed with the player, he was at Turf Moor about to sign when the Forest owner pulled the plug on the deal. If you're unaware of this you're by no means as well informed as you like to pretend.

---

I was aware and told you the deal wouldn't happen. What part of that didn't you understand?

The simple truth is anything can happen right until the players actually signs the contract and is photographed with his new shirt.

Word coming into my earpiece is that the Burnley FC Recruitment Team simply do not feel a player who is highly susceptible to knee knack is not worth matching what Boro are prepared to pay.

End of. Onwards and forwards!