Not the percentage chestnut again?
Every election/vote/referendum ever must be null and void then.
Printable View
Not the percentage chestnut again?
Every election/vote/referendum ever must be null and void then.
Geoff, exhausted by the continual positng by some that more people didn't vote Leave than did, posted "because the majority voted for it".Quote:
Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds
I thought I would, again, post the 2 figures for "didn't vote for" to give balance and hopefully show that "to every invalid argument there is an equally invalid and opposite argument".
We should all understand that the whole process is currently out of our hands and in those of the government of the day. At some point in the not too distant future they will either cancel Brexit altogether, Leave with an in, out, shake it all about deal not too dissimilat to May's deal or go full on No Deal Brexit.
The rest of us will have to put up with that decision unless they arrive at a decision and then put it back to the people in a 2nd (3rd if you count the 70s one as some do) referendum.
No amount of umming and arring and juggling figures that suit our own particular ends will change any of that. In the end, the ruling class will do what they think is best for them.
Hmmm...such is your eagerness to discredit you seem to have misunderstood.Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryRam
Those I described as being of ‘greater political significance’ than yourself and who you now refer to as ‘complete wasters’ were your very own leading Brexiteers...Rees-Mogg and other members of the ERG.
So...it is you who have described the Brexit process as ‘painful’ and they (members of the ERG) who have suggested Brexit may involve fifty years of recovery.
I ask again...remind me why then are we contemplating this...I think you’ll find GP’s answer was tongue in cheek...but when was the last time we all chased a dream of ‘pain’ and slow recovery?
It may have been tongue in cheek but it was also factually accurate....
The last time we chased a dream of pain and slow recovery was 27 May 2019, prior to that 24 May 2014 and we last achieved the dream on 28 May 2007. The subsequent pain was fairly intense and was immediatelh followed by 5 or so years of slow recovery.
Yet we still chase it, for it is our dream
I see you ignored your own ignore advice.. Brilliant, I knew you would. You were itching to jump back in.Quote:
Originally Posted by ramAnag
So we are so desperate now, we are clinging to single words used, to try any back your points.. Sad but hay ho, only to be expected. Trump once said black... Oh the indignation, the racist bigot..
Why does everything have to be taken to either end of the spectrum? Of course there will be painful areas, it would be nieve to assume there will not be areas that will lose out in some way. Please point me in the direction of any communication from the ERG that states that everything everywhere will be roses and everyone will be better off.
One little word and you decide that, that is enough not to go forward with anything. Jesus man (maybe I should have not used the 'man' word, as being a politically correct teacher, I am not sure which is the correct pronoun to use. I don't want to offend your gender), how do you even get up in the morning, you might stub a toe or something.. Did you never take a risk in your life? Mortgage? Anything. Talk about stagnate.
Okay...you misunderstood and now you feel foolish. I get it.Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryRam
So now you go on the attack...again...with another assortment of bogus assumptions and allegations.
If I ignore you your posts keep referring to me, if I answer you blather on about me not ignoring you and ‘itching to jump back in’.
So let’s just keep it to the issue in hand. We don’t like each other...frankly that bothers me not one jot...but personalised attack based entirely on ignorance is a waste of my time and not what I come on here for, Angry so if that’s what floats your boat take it up with someone else.
If you want to discusss...then discuss...if not, leave me out of it. My question is a simple one...that you and other much more influential advocates of Brexit have suggested that the process will be ‘painful’ and is likely to necessitate a half century of recovery.
Why is that a good idea?
To introduce a football context...if a new owner took over at Derby tomorrow and announced how privileged he felt to be running the club but warned that it would most likely take another fifty years to get us back to the top flight...how thrilled would you be?
I would never feel foolish responding to you Sweetpea. It cheers me up. Low hanging fruit i'm afraid.Quote:
Originally Posted by ramAnag
I would wait the 50 years, if it meant my club still existed and the following 50 years we won everything. At least my kids would enjoy it. It's not all about you!! :P What's your point?
Are you saying you would sacrifice long term stability for short term gain? Is that what you are all about? Gotta have it now mentality?
Bring something new to the discussion and we can discuss. Bloody hell even Swaledale and I nearly agreed on a few points. He lost the plot eventually but I feel we had a moment.. Touching really.
F+
To introduce a football context...if a new owner took over at Derby tomorrow and announced how privileged he felt to be running the club but warned that it would most likely take another fifty years to get us back to the top flight...how thrilled would you be?
Actually see my post a couple up where I make the same pain and suffering analogy, yet still we support.
I think the fundamental difficulty with your comparison is that you have to assume that Derby were presently in catastrophic management, and were about to be merged at board level with Forest, Chesterfield, Mansfield, Notts County and several east midlands minor teams. All our TV revenue would be taken of us and allocated to Spennymoor, Macclesfield and a few local clubs that we are trying to persuade to join us, or other weak clubs in our "alliance" to help bring their standards up.
We also have to consider that all our fans would be incorporated with Forest fans and others that we were merged with to form a single common fan army (maybe even a barmy one) and that we would be forced to take on players from local non league sides who would have equal rights to play for us regardless of ability.
We would also be forced to open our expensively developed academy to players from all clubs, who could then, having improved their lot, go back to their original clubs after a couple of years of training and improve those clubs - not ours.
There's a bit more to it which may help you appreciate that sometimes pain is worth it to avoid a bigger catastrophe
Let me know when it's safe to discuss climate change B)B)