re: OT: Asylum seekers and public opinion
Herbie, are you actually choosing to take a YouTube documentary as truth, as opposed to the official account? Why?
Regarding your comments on the Pentagon, if you don't believe what we're told, what did happen?
What happened to the people supposedly on board?
How do you explain phone calls made from the plane you think never hit the Pentagon?
What about eye-witness accounts?
What about bodies and belongings recovered from the scene?
How many people do you actually think would need to be involved in a hoax on such a scale?
Regarding CCTV cameras, they aren't exactly designed to pick-up jumbo jets falling out of the sky at 500mph or whatever. Apart from frame-rate and field of view considerations, they tend to focus on sensitive areas, like doorways or whatever.
re: OT: Asylum seekers and public opinion
Helio,
Good points made.
As to any bodies recovered, I have absolutely no idea.
The official version...
They spent £62m investigating Clinton affair with Lewinski and only £13m on the official 9/11 course of events.
The damage to the front of the Pentagon is not consistent with that of the plane that was supposed to have hit it. There is no damage to The Pentagon where the tail fin should have hit the building when the plane came in at an angle of 24 degrees. It's more the unexplained mathematics than anything else. The nosecone of the plane is quite a weak structure compared to the wings and tail fin. The tail fin didn't damage the pentagon at all....
Nothing of the 2 rolls Royce engines were found (said by Rolls Royce as to be practically indestructible). Neither black boxes were recovered. Incidentally, only 2 of all 8 possible black boxes were recovered. However, those two black boxes were damaged beyond repair. No data could be recovered from any of th
re: OT: Asylum seekers and public opinion
....so they attacked themselves?
re: OT: Asylum seekers and public opinion
They didn't prevent it either. No jets scrambled with 4 737's going where they pleased over and around NYC.
Did they attack themselves? Who knows.
Is it unheard if for governments to kill their own people?
Russia
Iraq
North Korea
Zimbabwe
Is it so unheard of?
re: OT: Asylum seekers and public opinion
You'll be telling me next that the USA doesn't arm Israel for their own aims / gains.
re: OT: Asylum seekers and public opinion
They kill enough human beings from other countries, so why not they're own? Not saying it was an inside job because I can't know that for sure, but the official story without doubt is false, so it points that way.
re: OT: Asylum seekers and public opinion
Herbs, have you any idea about the geography of these events? Have a look and it might explain why the US didn't have time to react. No one knew what was going to happen on that day. Would you order a fighter pilot to shoot down a commercial airliner if you weren't 100% sure what was happening?
re: OT: Asylum seekers and public opinion
Amanda, another miracle is the only plane to miss it's target was the one that was heading for the capital. How lucky was Mr Bush. Thank god he was sitting reading to the children. All other important people were immediately evacuated when the terrorist attacks started. The protocol in such events is to protect The President as he is to be considered the number one terrorist target. Why did they not remove and protect him immediately? Why did they wait 40 minutes? He was never in danger, that's why.
It's all just so bent.
re: OT: Asylum seekers and public opinion
Sota, the protocol is to shoot down any plane that is off course, turns it's transponder off and not responding to air traffic control calls. There were four planes doing that. Protocol would have been to shoot them down. Sad fact, but true.
Geography would indicate that NYC, Washington (and probably California) would be the highest targets and would have had military jets covering them. To think they couldn't scramble jets in time is just naive. The majority of jets were on war games practice in the north of the country. When jets were eventually scrambled (either after 40 Mins, or an hour and 40 Mins, can't remember which) they were sent off shore and out to sea, before turning around to try to intercept the final plane that ended up in the field.
If you are saying that geography prevented jets intercepting in Washington and NYC, then exactly which cities do the jets cover?
re: OT: Asylum seekers and public opinion
The protocol is to shoot down any plane that is off course? What the heck have you been reading?
By the way, Bush was at Booker High when he got the news of the attacks. Booker is about 10 miles north of me. Atta and co rented a house 5 miles south of me. How will I ever sleep again?
The plane in the field was brought down by heroes, not fighter jets.
Ps Would you order a fighter pilot to shoot down a commercial airliner if you weren't 100% sure what was happening?