Originally Posted by
tomytony
Rod,re. the question.
What did he do differently to the other 9? He got it right you say.He chased after him your hearsay evidence says
He certainly did get it right but your response only echoes what I have been saying all along- he got lucky for once.
It was no radical procedure change it was no recruitment policy chage according to your response.
The only difference you outline is that 'he want after him'. Which seems to say he didn't really 'go after' the rest.
What nonsense, just admit it, he got lucky thankfully.
No master stroke, no new approach, just luck.
And you praise him to the hilt for getting lucky after 9 failures.Moreover you expect others to adopt your illogical stance and praise him for getting lucky. Each to their own.
Now, onto QPR- 3 points?