Crowds and McCabes incentive to back Wilder.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomytony

Unfortunately, it's the past that shapes the future so it is of relevance particularly when based on experience and actions that have shaped the future.

He 's a big boy and is entitled to an opinion as is everyone else I agree

The fact that he cannot back it up with any sort of logic, reasoned argument or tailored ( to the question) response are summed up well by your word 'pathetic'.

The fact that he's now behaving like a child looking through the railings at the others playing should point out his pathetic need to be noticed.

---

He's made bad appointments which have. It's him millions. Cash wise, its cost you and I nothing. I've never yet seen anyone come up with an answer, other than he's making millions, the ground is worth £100m , it's all a tax dodge, we (?) paid for the hotel, the usual uninformed laughable bs from the terminally stupid.

More Rod bashing. Yes, everyone is entitled to their opinion, maybe like me he's sick and tired of reading the same anti McCabe posts every single day? You don't have to be pro McCabe to get bored with it. It's boring now full stop, there's no validation in constantly repeating yourself on the same subject year in year out. Especially when everyone knows what McCabes done wrong.

Weird obsessive behaviour dressed up as "resaonable" argument. If you came on here every day telling us about the ending of the Godfather film, everyone would think you were backward.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Holden_C

If you order something online you have a contract with the supplier. Legally binding. If it doesn't arrive, is it equally your fault?

---

I'll await the news that McCabe is suing the BRP for breach of contract.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Holden_C

No balance there whatsoever. Find him one of these buyers everyone says is out there.

You want him out but have no idea how to solve that. None of us do.

By the way, I didn't say you said you were happy, don't start that. I said it had gone quiet. Which it had. That, is a fact. Now we're back on a daily repeat, like Dave on TV.

It's like some want McCabe to fail.

---

And another flawed argument. I don't know how to cure cancer either but I'd like for someone to do so. I would say that if a team like Barnsley - with all due respect to them - can find a billionaire to invest in them, it can't be that hard a sell to find someone who'd want to invest in a club with our fanbase and potential. Perhaps if Mr McCabe could bear to give up his control of the club he might find it easier to find someone who could buy the club and take it to the next level.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Holden_C

More Rod bashing. Yes, everyone is entitled to their opinion, maybe like me he's sick and tired of reading the same anti McCabe posts every single day? You don't have to be pro McCabe to get bored with it. It's boring now full stop, there's no validation in constantly repeating yourself on the same subject year in year out. Especially when everyone knows what McCabes done wrong.
.

---

Interesting that you choose to ignore Rod's own trolling and deliberate misrepresentation of what others say. I'd also argue that by continually reminding ourselves of past mistakes we're ensuring that we won't have the wool pulled over our eyes.

It's sometimes hard not to bite when he makes a ****ing stupid comment deliberately intended to raise the hackles.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Carpe_diem

... find someone who could buy the club and take it to the next level.

---

Like Tunaman is doing at the oinkers, except their next level is one down. Its quite sweet how the anti-KK'ers seem to think he is a total and thorough incompetent, whereas he's a decent enough chairman who's made the odd poor mistake. If KK sold up, there is more evidence to suggest we would flounder under (inevitably) foreign ownship than succeed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Carpe_diem

And another flawed argument. I don't know how to cure cancer either but I'd like for someone to do so. I would say that if a team like Barnsley - with all due respect to them - can find a billionaire to invest in them, it can't be that hard a sell to find someone who'd want to invest in a club with our fanbase and potential. Perhaps if Mr McCabe could bear to give up his control of the club he might find it easier to find someone who could buy the club and take it to the next level.



Interesting that you choose to ignore Rod's own trolling and deliberate misrepresentation of what others say. I'd also argue that by continually reminding ourselves of past mistakes we're ensuring that we won't have the wool pulled over our eyes.

It's sometimes hard not to bite when he makes a ****ing stupid comment deliberately intended to raise the hackles.

---

You are a snowflake aren't you?

Find a buyer. Brilliant.

If you need to retype this in a daily basis to "remind" yourself, and presumably the rest of us halfwits, there's maybe a short term memory loss issue.

It's obsessive and utterly boring but you are entitled to post it, just as Rod, I and anyone else is entitled to comment on your post.

Rod can fend for himself but there's a delicious irony in accusing him of deliberately raising hackles while presumably your repeticious posts on one subject don't have the same effect on others.


Oh, have a more in depth look at the Barnsley deal.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FatherKnowsBest

Like Tunaman is doing at the oinkers, except their next level is one down. Its quite sweet how the anti-KK'ers seem to think he is a total and thorough incompetent, whereas he's a decent enough chairman who's made the odd poor mistake. If KK sold up, there is more evidence to suggest we would flounder under (inevitably) foreign ownship than succeed.

---

No. Again, and I don't know how many times I can possibly reiterate this, it's not a binary choice: McCabe or someone akin to Tunaman. There are many clubs that have been taken over that aren't doing too badly. It's utterly ridiculous to assume that a takeover would inevitably end up in Tunaman-style disaster.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Carpe_diem

It's utterly ridiculous to assume that a takeover would inevitably end up in Tunaman-style disaster.

---

...or (might I suggest...) Liverpool like success, for that matter. I know it isn't a binary choice, but some of you seem to think 'anyone but McCabe'. I don't think that is the case. I think 'better the devil we know, until we can find a better devil'.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FatherKnowsBest

...or (might I suggest...) Liverpool like success, for that matter. I know it isn't a binary choice, but some of you seem to think 'anyone but McCabe'. I don't think that is the case. I think 'better the devil we know, until we can find a better devil'.

---

No, again. If you're referring to me at least. I don't think 'anyone but McCabe'. What I do think is that McCabe isn't suited for the stewardship of our club, for reasons that I don't think I need to reiterate. I do think that he needs to make a clean break for the good of the club, but would I want him to sell to just anyone? No, not at all. But that's what due diligence is for.

Let's be under no illusions, either: if he struggles to sell the club, those struggles are of his own making, not ours. He's the one who has to make the sale attractive. There's nothing we as fans can do about that, other than showing the potential.

I would agree with your 'until we can find a better devil' to some extent, but how do we find that devil? McCabe is the one with the contacts, he's the one holding all the cards. I do know that while we continue to limp along, trying to do things on the cheap, ignoring the potential and being unwilling to compete, we're going to achieve the square root of sod-all, and all the good work he's done helping to build the fan base through affordable ticketing will be for naught as the fan of tomorrow will be going to the likes of Barnsley to see big name players.

Think about this: Leeds have had some pretty torrid times, but they've had some amazing highs as well, and they're currently just one point behind us in the league. Would you exchange the years of boring stability and our slow descent into utter mediocrity for what they've had, given that - in the long run - it's led to pretty much exactly the same place? That's a genuine question, by the way, and I'm not sure of my own answer there. It's something to consider, though. We might, as a club, be so scared of failing that we never actually try to succeed, and so seal our own fate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Longshortandtall

So in other words you don't really know your just speculating like everyone else on here.

---

And, after accusing others of poor analogies, using one that bears little relevance to the point in hand.