Cuffey Recalled

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Godsend.F.C.

I have trouble deciphering gru-somes posts at the best of times but I don't reckon he meant anything untoward.
Fairweather Academy player may mean BNC was more than capable when the rest of the team are playing well and went a little anonymous when we were struggling in games.
You may be interpreting it differently to me. His remark went way over my head as they usually do lol.

' A fair weather fan - someone who turns up when we play well and disappears when we're crap '

---

Not me I sit at NYS through all weather's, performances. We've freed some wages up waiting for signings now in time for Blackburn game. Play Hull & McCart today let's see what we've got.

I will be surprised if we get better loans coming in than either High or Cuffy ? Personally I thought Cuffy was played in the wrong position, he’s never a wing back ? Would have liked to have seen him given a role behind the striker, last game at Milwall where we used Lyndsay in that position was an ideal opportunity ! because Lindsay has not got enough ability to play that role ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Masbroughstreet

He’d have a lot less defending to do as a wing back at Arsenal than he would at Rotherham!

---

He's Quick, tricky, and can cross a good ball, he's a forward, with talent, I never saw Tom Finney, or Stan Matthews coming back to defend, and also Billy Wright coming up for headers, when he was a centre half, for England, hope he dose well ,in the future,!

Sorry he’s gone back, hope he’s **** at Coventry

Kioso is the better defender but needs to work on going forwards which looks like he is so alls good until he gets injured

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MILLERSTALE

I will be surprised if we get better loans coming in than either High or Cuffy ? Personally I thought Cuffy was played in the wrong position, he’s never a wing back ? Would have liked to have seen him given a role behind the striker, last game at Milwall where we used Lyndsay in that position was an ideal opportunity ! because Lindsay has not got enough ability to play that role ?

---

Yes I agree, he's a forward not a midfielder/defender. Quick, agile and tricky, but at least he was when he arrived here then he got the "run, forrest, run" treatment and became another Gump

He needs a full-back behind him ATM.

I'm not a fan of 3 at the back anyway.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by great_fire

He needs a full-back behind him ATM.

I'm not a fan of 3 at the back anyway.

---

Yes and no neither am I

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by great_fire

He needs a full-back behind him ATM.

I'm not a fan of 3 at the back anyway.

---

Which is exactly the point I made earlier.
We need to go to a back 4 to become more solid and allow our quicker players to get forward without having to worry about getting back to defend.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mellowmiller

Which is exactly the point I made earlier.
We need to go to a back 4 to become more solid and allow our quicker players to get forward without having to worry about getting back to defend.

---

Exactly

Sure I mentioned a back four before Warne left??? 🫢