Maynard out?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maddogslater

Just what we need, another thread started for someone to cry.
Supporters are not customers.

---

It’s also great spending other peoples money.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maddogslater

Just what we need, another thread started for someone to cry.
Supporters are not customers.

---

Some valid questions raised in the OP, though.

What’s interesting is the talk of stagnation when we have clearly progressed based solely on league position (from 14th to 6th).

The problem is what we’re witnessing: lack of entertaining football on the pitch under SM and selling our prime assets at the expense of the team. That does send out a negative message to supporters: we are prioritising finances over promotion. That’s understandable, obviously, but the owners should perhaps clarify how they see us progressing if they are to maintain the same philosophy of having a “competitive budget” despite us presumably being the best supported club in the division next season.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by i961pie

It?s also great spending other peoples money.

---

Thats a fair point. However if theyre going to do things *sustainably* (to some) or *on the cheap* (to others) its even more important that they get recruitment, both on and off the pitch, right.

The head coach being most important of all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Woodypie

We all know, the team that kicked the last ball this season was much weaker than the team that kicked the last ball last season. If Bros want to continue this tippy tappy fantasy, then they need to provide players that can actually do it. Players with experience. Players, and "coach" that can deliver. Not kids. Not have never beens. Basically, Bros have funded an expensive **** show. It's not good enough. If owners have a brand, that's fine. But get your cheque book out and pay for players that can deliver now. No projects. Customers move on from products they don't like. Or, get a manager that is able to shape a a squad. Wrexham were our peers. Now it's probably more like Newport.

---

Classic toys out the pram, the fact you?ve mentioned wrexham clearly shows this.

If you ever thought they were our ?peers? with the way they were operating, thats on you. Could always go and watch them seen as you are a ?customer? not a supporter?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by i961pie

It’s also great spending other peoples money.

---

That's the joys of owning a football club. You have to spend your own wonga

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by irishpete

That's the joys of owning a football club. You have to spend your own wonga

---

Yes but fans don’t know how much wonga they have to spend.

The fault in our clubs' struggle is 50% a crap manager and 50% a small squad containing unfit players.

For anyone wanting to defend Maynard, Ardley had a 30.5% loss rate for his time in charge, that included the last part of the relegation season

Maynard is at a 41.4% loss rate...

And before anyone argues the time, Ardley had 108 games, Maynard has had 70...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chicken Balti Pie

For anyone wanting to defend Maynard, Ardley had a 30.5% loss rate for his time in charge, that included the last part of the relegation season

Maynard is at a 41.4% loss rate...

And before anyone argues the time, Ardley had 108 games, Maynard has had 70...

---

I can't believe he's not been relieved yet.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chicken Balti Pie

For anyone wanting to defend Maynard, Ardley had a 30.5% loss rate for his time in charge, that included the last part of the relegation season

Maynard is at a 41.4% loss rate...

And before anyone argues the time, Ardley had 108 games, Maynard has had 70...

---

Bring back Ardley for the good old days.