Shrewsbury Post Match Thoughts

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gwru

I watched the game stone cold sober. Was Vaulks at fault for any of there goals? Was our best player yesterday. Our defence was that bad Wood stood out there. Williams, Potter had there worst games for us. Towell for his goal did ok but not much else. Moore had his usual game, if he doesn't score he's not contributed but put himself about. Next pen' we get let Johno take it. Frecks not fit & Forde not good enough pointless substitutes. To leave us with Ajayi & Mattock as Centre backs was criminal. Who played left back then?

---

I'll respond to each line.
I wasn't pissed but drinking beer whilst watching The Millers is something I enjoy. We tried 3 beers (1.2lts each) yesterday in the 2 hours we where watching.
I didn't say Vaulks was at fault for any of our goals but I thought he was poor and made the team poorer with his play in midfield.
Woods shouldn't have been replaced.
Potter hasn't shown the same form since his return from injury.
Towell won the penalty and scored the goal but played better with Frecklington.
Moore wasn't the same player yesterday as he's been.
The rest I agree with.
Johnno needs to be starting or someone up front with Moore.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Masbroughstreet

I think you mistake 'tries hardest' with 'plays best'

---

That is a great point that I should have added.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by frogmiller

I'll respond to each line.
I wasn't pissed but drinking beer whilst watching The Millers is something I enjoy. We tried 3 beers (1.2lts each) yesterday in the 2 hours we where watching.
I didn't say Vaulks was at fault for any of our goals but I thought he was poor and made the team poorer with his play in midfield.
Woods shouldn't have been replaced.
Potter hasn't shown the same form since his return from injury.
Towell won the penalty and scored the goal but played better with Frecklington.
Moore wasn't the same player yesterday as he's been.
The rest I agree with.
Johnno needs to be starting or someone up front with Moore.

---

I never said you were p*ssed. I sometimes have a couple of pints of larger before the game. Vaulks his game is about enthusiasm. His passing is adequate. His shooting would say best at the club.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gwru

I never said you were p*ssed. I sometimes have a couple of pints of larger before the game. Vaulks his game is about enthusiasm. His passing is adequate. His shooting would say best at the club.

---

If you can please watch the game back in full. His enthusiasm did us no good yesterday.

The team yesterday should have been 4-4-2 but to do that we have to leave someon on the bench and I would drop Vaulks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gwru

I never said you were p*ssed. I sometimes have a couple of pints of larger before the game. Vaulks his game is about enthusiasm. His passing is adequate. His shooting would say best at the club.

---

BTW I'd gladly have a pint with you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by frogmiller

BTW I'd gladly have a pint with you.

---

I drink in the ground so abit awkward. Thanks anyway. 4-4-2 problem we've got with that is with our squad we'd get overrun in midfield & our wingers can't do both cover our full backs & get forward.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by frogmiller

If you can please watch the game back in full. His enthusiasm did us no good yesterday.

The team yesterday should have been 4-4-2 but to do that we have to leave someon on the bench and I would drop Vaulks.

---

Totally agree, I've said before that I can't fault his effort, but based on ability he's 4th choice in Midfield for me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by frogmiller

If you can please watch the game back in full. His enthusiasm did us no good yesterday.

The team yesterday should have been 4-4-2 but to do that we have to leave someon on the bench and I would drop Vaulks.

---

Got to agree with you on this with a 442 we would have given Moore some support up front and we could have switched to 451 or 343 by only using one substitute in the end we played 451 then went 352 then took an experienced defender off and had vaulks ajayi and Mattock at back

Vaulks is the man. Keep knocking him. Sell him in January. Know who'll be better off. Just nobody good enough here to get the best out of him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gwru

Vaulks is the man. Keep knocking him. Sell him in January. Know who'll be better off. Just nobody good enough here to get the best out of him.

---

Do you think Vaulks is a better footballer than Frecklington, Towell or Potter? Yes or no? None of this crap about having spirit or having that something extra that nobody other than you can see. Just a simple yes or no answer.