The people supporting Lazlo are not making much sense. Their recurring argument is stability and nobody would argue that a long period with a good manager is better than changing managers all the time. If I could see any evidence that Lazlo is a credible option then I too would support him. His record elsewhere is decent.
HOWEVER, when he arrived at the club we arguable had the best pool of players in the Championship. We were top of the league. He completely threw away our league position and has made a series of absolutely baffling decisions that belies any real managerial competence. Numerous times I have arrived at games and scratched my head and predicted exactly what would happen and been proved right as his formation and line up has dissolved. I believe that he still has no idea as to his best team and best formation.
If, as is likely we do not get up at this time of asking then it will be the biggest gamble in the history of our club to give him funds and another year to get out of the championship. There must be a termination clause if he fails to get us up as that was his objective when hired. If we do not get the result on Friday which I predict 100% we wont then we need to immediately terminate this appointment and find the right replacement. For me that is Stuart McCall if he wants it.
We cannot afford any other managerial gambles!
As a btw I think if McKinnon has been retained he would NOT have done as badly as Lazlo has.

