Easy tigers. As with Covid, for the most part I'd say 'listen to the scientists', but unfortunately trustworthy people are less easy to identify in the arena of climate change than Covid - on the credit side, and lets hope he lasts til at least 200, David Attenborough, on the debit side Greta Thunberg, I have yet to discuss climate change with anyone who finds her message appealling.
BUT its not, IMO, a 'cult', the warming of the planet is a fact, the linking of that to the use of fossil fuels is less certain but there is a weight of evidence.
BUT BUT, gotta say there ARE a lot of zealots around, a lot of scaremongering and a lot of fake news/correlations. Fantastic story on TV last week thatcovered all those bases, a 'popular sunday night programme' offered the destruction by fire of a combine harvester as directly climate change related. Like the 'Poles being killed by racists' bo-locks post Brexit, further digging determined that this was rubbish - the fire was caused by a fuel leak, and in any case CHs are tested to operating conditions of well over 40 degrees anyway, both of which facts the presenter/producer/programme should have and probably did know, but it didn't suit the narrative. As with other sensitive subjects discussed from time to time on this forum, the more stories like the above abound, either far fetched, patently untrue or without provenance, the more those in the middle ground will adopt AN 'anti-' approach IMO.