Yes, I know that British Steel paid more than Hadfields. It’s not a dig, as you put it; it’s making the point that the TUs set worker upon worker and, in this instance set higher paid worker on lower paid worker. Is that what TUs are supposed to do?
Printable View
You've not set anything out. You simply made a series of statements base on your opinion. There is no scientific evidence that says companies will leave if taxation rises above a certain level. There is much more to it.
Yours is no more a researched argument than mine.
At least I qualified my statement as opinion rather than your attempt to try to trot it out as researched fact. These are best guesses at best.
I'm against what Labour is proposing because it has nothing to do with employee share ownership. Rather than me spell it out for you, I'll leave it to The Guardian and FT:
https://www.theguardian.com/business...hare-ownership
https://www.ft.com/content/60257bcc-...1-d36dfef1b89a
It's a 10% nationalisation and a tax grab. I'm astounded that you haven't spotted it, but maybe it's the rose tinted spectacles?
I've made the point that companies will inevitably react to the raft of Labour policies that will make the UK a less attractive place to do business. You surely can’t disagree with that? I have yet to see anyone offer any sort of reasoned response – just statements of blind faith that it won’t happen.
Left its mark on me those times Frank , stood alongside men who I'd trust with my life , the camaraderie was extraordinary .
It was also the worst of times , the despair and sheer helplessness of it all .
One of the young lads who I work with is fascinated with this shyte , makes me feel like I'm some sort of minor celebrity because I took part in the strike .
He's a great kid , really taken to the lad because he's genuinely interested .
Unimaginable to him that work could lead to that .
And here's a bit of evidence for you, Wan:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-50536205