You're like a stuck record.
You have a concern but nothing to back it up. Maybe just back off this for a bit and give us all a rest from it?
Printable View
I'll put it simply, for the simple.
The original rent was highly beneficial and non-onerous towards Dundee FC.
Dee4Life renegotiated into a higher and increasingly higher level for their benefit, to the detriment of Dundee FC - and because the person who did it hadn't any clue what they were doing.
In this case nobody was to blame for the ridiculous rent than the people who negotiated it and yet you keep referring back to Bob Brannans time.
You can pour in as many directions as you like but this one was down to dee4life
Have you seen the way property and land prices are rising? Why would Soho Green sell an investment that's increasing in value year on year whilst also earning them significant income in the form of interest? The amount invested by them will be insignificant in their eyes and won't exactly be a burden to them - can't see their accountants chasing them to sell assets to remain solvent in the near future; can you?
I enclose details of the Soho Green website. https://sohogreen.co.uk/investor-information/
It states that high net worth investors could earn between 8% - 12% interest on their investment.
That is assuming that borrowers repaid their loan in full including all the interest due on their loan.
I cannot see high net worth investors being interested in holding Dens Park in their portfolio in lieu of them receiving between 8% and 12% on their investment.
It means that people and businesses borrowing funds from Soho Green with their asset secured against their loan are paying a high annual rate of interest for their loan. In addition to investors receiving between 8% and 12% Soho Green will likely be receiving a separate % rate of interest as a introducer fee and to cover their overheads plus profits.
In my opinion 8% to 12% is good rate of interest to receive providing people and businesses borrowing the money do not default on their loans.
Then it becomes a nightmare if these high net worth individuals end up owning land or property due to loans not being repaid in full.
I thought the original purchase price of the Campy site was about ?1.2m, would that be about 8 years ago. Surely there would be some capital appreciation and the land isxworth more than they paid for it?
269.....this thing defo January?