Oh dear,

He’ll start a new United supporters group with a membership of one so that the Dee C Thomson journos can continue to post his drivel as from The United Fans CHIEF........

https://www.eveningtelegraph.co.uk/f...r-hooliganism/

Strict liability......on this logic then

So if someone is abusive on Twitter it’s arabtrusts responsibility

If someone misbehaves at a political rally, it’s the MP’s responsibility

If an assault happens in a classroom, it’s the schools responsibility

If there’s trouble at an AGM, got to be the Chairman’s responsibility

If Someone behaves like a maddy let’s blame the frogs


Not for strict liability myself, can see why our “fans chief” might prefer that route though

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hoofballer

Not for strict liability myself, can see why our “fans chief” might prefer that route though

---

Our self appointed Fans Chief needs to wind his neck in before he once again tarnishes our bad name! Oops! Too late!

As to strict liability, i am all for it as long as the real trouble makers on match day are the losers. They cannot be held responsible for what some half wit puts online, but they should be in a position to comment to distance themselves from some so called supporters.

I remember some fans on the tele when Rankgers disappeared, who were they?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jjaflup22

Make that f@cking 3!

---

Always said he was a brilliant striker 🤣🤣🤣

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RaysRedEye

Hiya Mike :-)

---

Hey Ray 😀

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PortugueseFrank

**** knows why he mentioned me.

He's going down swinging and he wont be going away. Expect him to channel it all into his Wee Jim's TA group.

I've never said anything insulting about him. I've just expressed an opinion that it is all wasted energy bickering on and that Trust tweets attacking fans who attacked him is a minter.

---

Not sure ive ever read a post from you that insults anyone - indeed you have had to take some and critisism but always you have been above all that. Agree with you here

He has went from saying I should get honorary membership of the trust because I've championed a single fan group and cooperation to what he said on Twitter.

All because I disagree with his approach in how he tries to win people over to his side of the argument.

If fan groups want people to join their side then they have to communicate a compelling reason for people to do it. You won't win anyone over with antagonism.

I think even he would agree he hasn't done anything of the sort in terms of presenting a compelling argument for his views with the recent stuff which will be why he is quitting.

Not everything has to be a battle and NONE of it has to be personal (and that goes for everyone).