The club and Willock are quite far apart regarding personal terms apparently:
https://twitter.com/SkySportsNews/st...7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Hopefully they will come to an agreement before the Wet Spam game
Printable View
The club and Willock are quite far apart regarding personal terms apparently:
https://twitter.com/SkySportsNews/st...7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Hopefully they will come to an agreement before the Wet Spam game
Willock wants money,
Mike offered Donnay socks and vests.
Probably this. Pay him what he's worth ffs! How many players have we got off the wage bill in the last 12 months?Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Kirkland
For us to lose a player on personal terms after the fee had been agreed by the two cubs would be a first even for our shambles of a club.
Surely not, eh?
Maybe he wants get out clauses etc. put in his contract, other than that surely it's just a case of crossing the T's and dotting the I's.
Then again it's Ashley he's dealing with, enough said.
Well....apparently (who knows how these things get out but I, for one, don't have any difficulty believing it), he wants parity with our top earners-Shelvey and ASM-on 90 grand a week. And Charnley's offer is way off.
From what i can tell its about the length of contract rather than how much he'll earn per week
I heard it was about length of contract as well.
We want him to sign a 6 year one and he wants a 4 year one at max.
Who can blame him quite frankly.
Willocks agent propably wants short deal with high signing on fee. Thats the way it goes. If Newcastle want longer deal (6 years) they have to pay more. Agent wants every pound what he can squeeze. Thats his job.
Absolute joke of an organisation.
Money dropped off the wage bill, no signings, sky money. Charlatans.
West Ham didn't get Lingard did they, imagine if he ended up there this week.