Worst decision EVER to award that penalty. So we get even, great, but in such a fashion, when we are actually the better side at the moment? Seems defenders aren't supposed to defend any more, useless.
Printable View
Worst decision EVER to award that penalty. So we get even, great, but in such a fashion, when we are actually the better side at the moment? Seems defenders aren't supposed to defend any more, useless.
Playing reasonably well. 5hite penalty decision but hey-ho, 1-1 seems right at mo.
England are the better side at the moment, bit of a contentious penalty, seen worse given, and better not given, good game though.
Seemed like we were back to our annoying ways in the second half (the first was excellent), but Watkins made something out of nothing.
Fair play to the lad!
Uruguay v Colombia was mental!
So…
Marsch and Bielsa will meet, but not in the game they hoped for.
I think corrupt FIFA have decided that England needed to be in tbe Final, just as they did with Argentina several years ago (Lord Messi is allowed deliberate hand ball twice against us in Q/Final). That was NEVER a penalty in a hundred years. Disgraceful. Bumbling Southgate gets referee assistance. We were robbed in World Cup v Argentina, and robbed again v England. Come on FIFA.....when is it our turn? What is the cost for a penalty? Sick of FIFA and their corrupt practices. And before anyone says they're not corrupt.....how did football giants Qatar get to host in 2022?
Harsh penalty but under the rules it’s giveable. England have been on the end of some odd decisions over the years too (Beckham red card, hand of god etc).
Surely Holland have better than Weghorst to play at 9 - I had to double take and make sure I hadn’t switched to a John Smiths advert.