NO and that's perfectly clear in my whole post, although clearly either your comprehension skills are lacking or you interpret what you read to align with your own dogma and blinkered thinking.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy_Faber
Printable View
NO and that's perfectly clear in my whole post, although clearly either your comprehension skills are lacking or you interpret what you read to align with your own dogma and blinkered thinking.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy_Faber
No I ****ing didn't, I merely said I saw no reason to respect the man now he is dead, when I didn't respect him before.Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone
That's repeating what's been pushed out by the right wing and MAGA lot in the US and Kimmel who was "cancelled" but now happily is back on air didn't "laud" Kirk's death either just made an observation that was fundamentally true.
Me too! Entirely agree. Unfortunately it is a repeated strategy of some on here to exaggerate and misrepresent.Quote:
Originally Posted by MadAmster
Swale has neither lauded nor wallowed in Kirk’s death. He’s suggested that the fact that someone has died shouldn’t alter one’s opinion of them and, imo, he’s quite right.
Those who feel the need to misrepresent have usually lost the argument in my experience.
What?s clear is you got caught out.Quote:
Originally Posted by swaledale
Glad you've recovered from your arduous drive back from holidays (?) and good to see you nestled in the back seat again 😃😃Quote:
Originally Posted by ramAnag
Thanks, but you really are odd. You and AF constantly and consistently agree with/support each other but no one is infantile enough to mention rear seat/rear gunner etc, yet every time I agree with Swale you reach for the same tedious and childish response.Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone
You’ve said nothing about MA, who reached exactly the same conclusion, but it’s Swale and rA so, in your head, I must be just acting in his defence.
It’s nothing to do with that. Yes, Swale and I - and MA, mac and Sith for that matter - often agree politically, while you, AF and TTR - if he can tear himself away from all things Thai - tend to adopt an opposite stance. That is kind of what happens in arguments and debates so don’t be surprised if and when you get called out for fabricating and misrepresenting others. If you talk bollux and say things that are simply untrue you - and anyone else - are likely to get shot down in flames…and not just by me.
Simply understood what was written. Nothing special.Quote:
Originally Posted by ramAnag
I think we are all too far into these debates not to have each revealed personal tactics/quirks which can be exploited, some fairly, some not, by others (and yes, myself included). I think you?ve just got to put your big boy pants on (or Swales-damn, there I go again) and take it as part of the game.Quote:
Originally Posted by ramAnag
Indeed. Sadly something that appears beyond one or two as, unfortunately, AF’s latest foolish response confirms.Quote:
Originally Posted by MadAmster
If you’ve got a point, make it…if you’ve got to make stuff up you probably haven’t got a point to make.