Printable View
So we just ignore the 5 or 6 years of good work before? Yes it was a bad season for him, no one can argue that. I’m not saying he’s the messiah by any stretch but to have one bad season out of 8 hardly warrants huge criticism.Quote:
Originally Posted by Davy500
And he also got Wimbledon promoted to League One, under significant financial constraints. Leaving Wimbledon higher in the football pyramid tan when he joined.Quote:
Originally Posted by Davy500
Comedy gold, don't stop Davy#noagenda
No he would not have left wimbledon in a higher league , because if they had stayed they would have been relegatedQuote:
Originally Posted by Killerkline
He did well for just one season, the rest average, then terribleQuote:
Originally Posted by matt_magpie
The point being we employed him when he was at his worst, says it all really
So it must be all the financial freedom at Notts, that causing him the troubleQuote:
Originally Posted by Killerkline
The real thing is Ardley had no pressure at wimbledon, they were a little club not expecting to do much, so years of mediocre was acceptable. Its a completely different story at Notts, where the pressure is on him, years of mediocre is not acceptable , especially in the national league
"Says it all really?" Or says it all about Hardy that season?Quote:
Originally Posted by Davy500
Here we go - everybody but Ardley again ..Quote:
Originally Posted by laddo
Hold on. You are blaming Ardley for being approached and appointed by then Notts County Chairman Alan Hardy "when he employed him when he was at his worse".
Read that back to yourself, cos that's what you are saying. Try and spot the obvious connection and responsibility.
Of course you can't blame Alan Hardy for the appointment of Ardley because.....
Nope me neither. Anyone?
No fool, i blame Ardley for accepting a job knowing all the circumstances , that he then failed at , nobody else fault but Ardleys got that