Printable View
Better things to do etc...but, yes...that’s who I was referring to and I don’t think it justified Andy’s ‘fantasy/dragon’ reference.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds
‘Smarty pants’...why?
MY ‘Abbots/Corbyns/Lammys’...I’ve told you so many times that I think the first two are their own worst enemy, even though their constituents apparently don’t...I see little point in you reintroducing them.
I repeat no it wasn’tQuote:
Originally Posted by ramAnag
My point RA, was 2 prominant MP's defended a know criminal migrant, who should not have been here to kill again.Quote:
Originally Posted by ramAnag
Not the for the first time either. Breivik was a know Norwegian nutter. Their nutter.
So why bring him up?
TBF to rA, Tricky, rA didn't bring Breivik up, it was the S Man!
Yes but it does show how, figures get exaggerated for effect and there is a strong view that contrary to your assertion that its gone up in number, even official figures think that's an over estimate as many who applied have returned back home as economies in eastern Europe have improved, or because of Brexit and there were a number of duplicate applications.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds
In point of FACT neither rA or myself told you they had all gone home in droves. Many have but I doubt you can show a post where we said ALL!I pointed out that since Brexit migration from the EU had fallen but had been replaced by non EU migration! Which must have been a bitter pill for the racists amongst the Brexiteers to swallow.
Presumably the fact that there is a severe labour shortage especially in the agricultural and service industry sectors - such that crops have been left to rot in the fields as there has been no labour, pigs have had to be killed on farms and not enter the food chain as they were over weight due to lack of staff for abattoirs and processing plants, rather supports the view that there are considerably less in the UK post Brexit? So not sure how you come to the conclusion we made facts up?
But they are the same in this instance, or did you miss that? Your credibility is rather low at the moment, non existent since you said you agreed with every incorrect thing that GP said in his piss take post! I mean fancy making a fool of oneself like that!Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy_Faber
By doing some research and finding out you’ve made the facts up. It’s not difficult. Substantiate your Pigs one exactly as youve, written it, my best knowledge is that there are no pigs currently being slaughtered and destroyed and that when they were it was a mix of a number of reasons. Happy to be correctedQuote:
Originally Posted by swaledale
Can you make facts up? Surely they are then not facts?
That’s a fact. A bit like a goal being disallowed. Can’t happen, it was never a goalQuote:
Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone
Well there have been others in incident sin Norway, but I was quoting that case to demonstrate that your assertion that there were no tensions in Norway to be false. It was simplistic I know, but then you tend to be all the time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds
Norway has a decidedly different society and different culture and lifestyle to the UK and as GP pointed out in actual per head of population has denser immigrant population than the UK and this in country which until the last few decades hasn't had much of a history of large scale immigration unlike the UK.
Lets look at the facts of the Ernesto Elliott case - an argument between drug dealers results in one of them being killed. You pick out the fact that possibly if one of the guys had been deported (though his son who was also involved would have still been here) it possibly wouldn't have happened.
What you don't say and this is relevant to what happened here is that the deportation was halted at the time of the governments Windrush scandal, when people who had lived here for a long time had been treated appallingly by the and in some cases deported illegally. The deportation flight had people on board whom the home office admitted should not have been on it and the case went to court and the flight was stopped for not complying with the law!
IN actual fact this case, is not about the one person, he was a by product of a proven example of government incompetence. Those who campaigned against the Windrush deportations which were unlawful were not wrong in doing so.
Its no more or less than examples of other criminals who fail to get prosecuted or even pursued for an offence who later go on to kill, the only difference is they aren't immigrants.
So it suits the government to spew out a false rhetoric about not being able to deport criminals (it can) because it diverts attention from the fact they aren't doing things properly.
Its not that current systems are open to abuse, and when they are its been shown that the government and home office are the ones abusing them. I mean take the Chinese cockle picker tragedy, all illegal immigrants, the relevant agencies must have been aware beforehand but nothing was done, why? Incompetence, lack of resources, lack of will?
Its the same with he channel crossings - virtually none prior to Brexit - why? because under the EU we had an agreement to return those who had no valid reason not to claim asylum in another safe country. The current government failed to renegotiate this at the time of leaving the EU, incompetence or just arrogance?
Now they are proposing legislation which will do nothing to stop them.
Yet again at the time of actually leaving the EU, the government could ahve opened a processing centre in France - the French actually offered to assist and fund this, that coupled with a an efficient processing system for Asylum claims would then see those who don't qualify deported.
Instead of which we get government by rhetoric, whilst doing **** all to manage the problem.