re: Allardyce an objective viewpoint
chill out weirdilocks, wasn't digging you out sunshine
i think the bloke is on a wind up as do you, many think he's been WHUFC man and boy by the looks
69 - I must try not to be so aggressive mate but the bloke is on a wind up, hence my extra aggression mate
re: Allardyce an objective viewpoint
Our owners obviously think so as they gave him the contract and continue to pay it.
re: Allardyce an objective viewpoint
Quote:
Originally Posted by WHU
chill out weirdilocks, wasn't digging you out sunshine
i think the bloke is on a wind up as do you, many think he's been WHUFC man and boy by the looks
69 - I must try not to be so aggressive mate but the bloke is on a wind up, hence my extra aggression mate
I do like it when you call me Weirdilocks you know. :heart:
re: Allardyce an objective viewpoint
Average Whiskyman?
I`d say well below average mate.:(
re: Allardyce an objective viewpoint
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastEastEastLondon
I dont think its so much the OPS point of view, although he doesnt agree with it, its more the past and the way in which he has tried to put them across. Dont just look at this thread look at others.
This one isnt so bad, but in past posts the OP has come across as condescending which in itself says to a degree that his own opinion is right.
It has stuck.
There are optimists pessimists and realists, all are right at some time.
Agree, its not what ammeread said but they way that he said it, plus previous form has gone against him.
Don't go to games, but from what I can gather the fans haven't really turned on BFS. Granted they have never got behind him on mass (and nor should they in my opinion) but has they been much Sam out stuff.
Any anti Sam fan really wants to be proved wrong I guess. Perhaps I shouldn't speak for others (something ammeread is keen to do), but I certai
re: Allardyce an objective viewpoint
[quote="frogiron"]Sam Allardyce the most hated man in East London some of it he's brought upon himself admittedly, some of it I believe is unwarranted.
Allardyce was brought to this club during a period of turmoil some of the worst times in our clubs history . He was asked to steady the ship. He steadied the ship. He was asked to get us promoted within two seasons . He got us promoted in one. He was asked to keep us up. He kept us up. He was asked to keep us up again he kept us up again.
He has done everything he was employed to do. He has done everything the board asked of him. Yes he has upset people along the way.He's made stupid and disrespectful comments in some people's eyes .He has played mainly boring football,he plays the percentages far too much and he's generally void of a plan B.
On the other hand he has been largely forced into some decisions by injuries and the players he has had at his disposal
re: Allardyce an objective viewpoint
Quote:
Originally Posted by ammeread
I dont think its so much the OPS point of view, although he doesnt agree with it, its more the past and the way in which he has tried to put them across. Dont just look at this thread look at others.
This one isnt so bad, but in past posts the OP has come across as condescending which in itself says to a degree that his own opinion is right.
It has stuck.
There are optimists pessimists and realists, all are right at some time.
Agree, its not what ammeread said but they way that he said it, plus previous form has gone against him.
Don't go to games, but from what I can gather the fans haven't really turned on BFS. Granted they have never got behind him on mass (and nor should they in my opinion) but has they been much Sam out stuff.
Any anti Sam fan really wants to be proved wrong I guess. Perhaps I shouldn't speak for others (s
re: Allardyce an objective viewpoint
Quote:
Originally Posted by IronworksFC
I dont think its so much the OPS point of view, although he doesnt agree with it, its more the past and the way in which he has tried to put them across. Dont just look at this thread look at others.
This one isnt so bad, but in past posts the OP has come across as condescending which in itself says to a degree that his own opinion is right.
It has stuck.
There are optimists pessimists and realists, all are right at some time.
Agree, its not what ammeread said but they way that he said it, plus previous form has gone against him.
Don't go to games, but from what I can gather the fans haven't really turned on BFS. Granted they have never got behind him on mass (and nor should they in my opinion) but has they been much Sam out stuff.
Any anti Sam fan really wants to be proved wrong
re: Allardyce an objective viewpoint
Quote:
Originally Posted by ammeread
I dont think its so much the OPS point of view, although he doesnt agree with it, its more the past and the way in which he has tried to put them across. Dont just look at this thread look at others.
This one isnt so bad, but in past posts the OP has come across as condescending which in itself says to a degree that his own opinion is right.
It has stuck.
There are optimists pessimists and realists, all are right at some time.
Agree, its not what ammeread said but they way that he said it, plus previous form has gone against him.
Don't go to games, but from what I can gather the fans haven't really turned on BFS. Granted they have never got behind him on mass (and nor should they in my opinion) but has they been much Sam out stuff.
An
re: Allardyce an objective viewpoint
Quote:
Originally Posted by IronworksFC
I dont think its so much the OPS point of view, although he doesnt agree with it, its more the past and the way in which he has tried to put them across. Dont just look at this thread look at others.
This one isnt so bad, but in past posts the OP has come across as condescending which in itself says to a degree that his own opinion is right.
It has stuck.
There are optimists pessimists and realists, all are right at some time.
Agree, its not what ammeread said but they way that he said it, plus previous form has gone against him.
Don't go to games, but from what I can gather the fans haven't really turned on BFS. Granted they have never got behind him on mass (and nor should they in my o