Will Burnley..

... supporters please bugger off back to their own boards?
I thought if I started a new thread with "Burnley" as part of the heading, we might be able to hijack it at some stage to talk about Rovers
For example, I agree with GB that there needs to be consistency about the award of hand-ball penalties. I have no major complaint about the one on Tuesday, but Bowyer is right that it could be seen as ball-to-hand with no immediate threat of a goal, and no realistic way of getting the hand out of the way in time. I suppose different referees are always going to have different interpretations, but I hope the authorities do make every effort to ensure consistency in such decisions.

If you haven't seen it, watch this link. - view external link

I would say it was a penalty,but what about the quality of our goals.
Everyone was a real gem,especially Rudy`s,he showed a great amount of courage and commitment to get his head on that one .

Some great football for both sides for the goals. Shame about the offside goal as that was another well worked goal.
The handball was a penalty as his arms were spread wide and not in the natural position of by his side. But the sooner they just make it handball if it hits your hand/arm the better, so everyone knows where they stand.

And finally what a header at the end. You can't ask anymore from a player.

Watching Dunny with them quick feet for the 2nd goal was an absolute joy. Rudy's header was also fantastic. What's happened to our defending though?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quickenthetempo

Some great football for both sides for the goals. Shame about the offside goal as that was another well worked goal.
The handball was a penalty as his arms were spread wide and not in the natural position of by his side. But the sooner they just make it handball if it hits your hand/arm the better, so everyone knows where they stand.

And finally what a header at the end. You can't ask anymore from a player.

---

QTT - I know what you're saying about having the arms at the player's sides, but is that REALLY the "natural position"? You try running or turning like that. It feels completely UNNATURAL to me!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AucklandRover

Some great football for both sides for the goals. Shame about the offside goal as that was another well worked goal.
The handball was a penalty as his arms were spread wide and not in the natural position of by his side. But the sooner they just make it handball if it hits your hand/arm the better, so everyone knows where they stand.

And finally what a header at the end. You can't ask anymore from a player.

---

QTT - I know what you're saying about having the arms at the player's sides, but is that REALLY the "natural position"? You try running or turning like that. It feels completely UNNATURAL to me![/quote]

I think it's one of those 50/50's. I said no pen, (ball to arm), my lad said it clearly was, (unnatural bodyshape and all that) - I obviosuly didn't warp his mind quite well enough :( .

But anyway, as no one agrees, surely we can all agree that it was a controversial pe

The handball rule is quite simple these days isn't it?

Your hands must be "inside" the line of your body. If they are "outside" and the ball hits them it's handball.

Doesn't matter how unnatural you may find it.

I should have added "Interpretation of" before the last post.

I see Burnley are still going strong.

With all these new fangled rules, it's hard to tell what's what these days Sven. It all sparred going downhill with the passback rule. XD

And Burnley have a very good season. Unbeaten this calendar year too :O

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by seventwo

The handball rule is quite simple these days isn't it?

Your hands must be "inside" the line of your body. If they are "outside" and the ball hits them it's handball.

Doesn't matter how unnatural you may find it.

---

I've always thought there should be an element of INTENT, except in cases where the hand/arm clearly prevented the ball from entering the net.
Otherwise, you can get get cases like the hand-ball given against Steven Nzonzi at Norwich which was quite clearly ludicrous. It simply isn't realistic to expect a player's hands to be inside the line of his body when moving at speed or attempting a tackle.
I saw one given in the A-League this season when the player had his back to the ball! Fair enough, the arm blocked a dangerous cross, but common sense surely has to enter the equation.