Pop on clarets mad they have been talking about signing gestede for 3 million they must be having a laugh or they are still delirious from moving out of the bottom 3
Printable View
Pop on clarets mad they have been talking about signing gestede for 3 million they must be having a laugh or they are still delirious from moving out of the bottom 3
I'd want all the rovers team for three million.. :)
They'll never fit in your camper-van, Alf.Quote:
Originally Posted by alfinyalcabo
But I suppose they could pull it, like reindeer.
Led, of course, by Rudi, the red-nosed...
What was in that last glass?
Ings will be leaving in Jan as they won't let him leave for free in the summer. And it's telling he won't sign a new contract. It will be more like 5mil to take Gestede, which for us would be great business.
'Ings will be leaving in Jan'
No he won't.
'leave for free in the summer'
No he won't.
'telling he won't sign a new contract'
Not really - like most players he will go where the money is.
It was talked about on ClaretsMad simply because it was in one of the Sunday papers .
qpr rumoured to want rhodes and gestede.. and we have a transfer embargo, so couldn`t replace them with anyone decent if they went..
We have Venky's at the helm who are daft as brushes anyway when it comes to this sort of thing. But in all fairness, the stick to what they say, so if they say they're not for sale, we can take that as settled unless someone hits a release clause, which probably exceeds what anyone would want to pay anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by jordan12rhodes
We have Venky's at the helm who are daft as brushes anyway when it comes to this sort of thing. But in all fairness, the stick to what they say, so if they say they're not for sale, we can take that as settled unless someone hits a release clause, which probably exceeds what anyone would want to pay anyway.[/quote]Quote:
Originally Posted by DanRrr
i personally want rhodes replaced long term, but i wouldnt want him gone with no-one of a decent standard coming in to replace him in january..
We have Venky's at the helm who are daft as brushes anyway when it comes to this sort of thing. But in all fairness, the stick to what they say, so if they say they're not for sale, we can take that as settled unless someone hits a release clause, which probably exceeds what anyone would want to pay anyway.[/quote]Quote:
Originally Posted by jordan12rhodes
i personally want rhodes replaced long term, but i wouldnt want him gone with no-one of a decent standard coming in to replace him in january..[/quote]
Emile Heskey has indicated that he's available to play again. Would you swap him for Rhodes? Ex-England international, European experience and eye for goal unless he's wearing a red or white shirt, (so he's have to avoid any game where we wear our 3rd kit).