On SSN now, no fee paying transfers.
Printable View
On SSN now, no fee paying transfers.
I dont know all the inns & outs of FFP.. so does that mean you will need to sell players to get losses down ( what was the loss for the club 2013-2014 accounts anyone know ?)
It seems we can sign one if one leaves, but no fee allowed.
What I want to know, is what happened with clubs like Bolton. Last I saw they was net debt 163 million
Ipswich lost 7.1 million in 2014
9.7 million in 2013?
Birmingham net debt £24 million
Brighton net debt 54 million
Cardiff- net debt 85 Million, wages 190% of turnover
And on and on.
Yet only 3 clubs are penalized? weird - view external link
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds
I thought it was if you losses were less than £8 million you escaped any punishemnt, It was on sky earlier this month that Ipswich would escape any punishment as their losses were now down to 7.1 million
do you know what your loss is on your accounts for 2013-2014 ?
We all knew it was coming. - view external link
Quote:
Originally Posted by binghampies
I thought it was if you losses were less than £8 million you escaped any punishemnt, It was on sky earlier this month that Ipswich would escape any punishment as their losses were now down to 7.1 million
do you know what your loss is on your accounts for 2013-2014 ?[/quote]
We are all still waiting for the exact figures.
I don't dispute the punishment though. I am confused as to why it is only 3 clubs?
It seems that club overall debts are being ignored?
Take Bolton. How the hell are they going to recover net losses of 180 Million? Yet they don't get pen
Polish, the work-arounds though appear more intrusive than perhaps you had previously flagged. This one out, one in isnt quite that simple I now see.
I think the no fees (transfer fees, loans fees) may make it difficult to trade with many clubs, and thats without considering the £600k pa max cost.
On a positive, may be you will look at a different approach and go for hungry up and coming younger players. I still think you have an issue to shift some of your deadwood that is consuming so much in wages, and that wont be as easy as many think. I note that Abdoun is still there - case in question!
Unfortunately for Florest, I think this period of change is necessary BUT will help rebuild sound foundations for the future. May then see more Osborne's & Co coming thro the ranks, which has to be a good outcome
I'm only bothered about what happens in June.will we have another or will we of shown enough to suggest we are dealing with it?
Regards the others we will know in a few weeks weather they will be punished or not.
They did say, that big steps had been made cutting costs last summer. They was trying to use it to show that the club is going in the right direction. Obviously it is of no use right now, but in part it has been the basis of the new way of calculating the losses.Quote:
Originally Posted by Polish_ForestMad
IE if you can show you are reducing debt over years rather than a full stop point. It will count.