...if they get up this season, they are looking tae spend £25million on players tae keep up wi the Aberdeen...and I thought tae masel, zepmeister these daft bassas never learn XD >:)
Printable View
...if they get up this season, they are looking tae spend £25million on players tae keep up wi the Aberdeen...and I thought tae masel, zepmeister these daft bassas never learn XD >:)
Dave's basically telling ye...
We are Rangers, we'll do what we want >:)
well nothing new there then bluek.
Aye reve, we just have tae wait for big Ped to give us the go ahead. :blue:
seriously bluek, is it not a tad suspicious how a lot of changes and decisions have been made by the sfa the last 3 years that have surprisingly benefitted rangers, even to the point rules were broken, ignored, changed etc.
do you think its healthy for rangers to be given favourable treatment to such a massive degree, as people will always bring it up in future, shouldnt they had been allowed to work thier way back given the same set of rules as evereyone else.
you simply cannot have a game where one team is governed by a different set of rules.
We're not governed by different rules. The clubs are the decision makers.
Take any issues you have to your club and ask them to explain to you so that you might understand.
1. introduction of the play offs to allow 1 particular club a cusion if they fek up promotion.
2. livvy found for breaking the duel ownership rules. rangers allowed time for thier egm to go ahead before they got thier fine.
3.rangers newco allowed direct entry into the 4rth tier despite the rules saying they needed 3 years audited accounts which they didnt have. all other clubs who applied for entry into into the bottom tier had to have these accounts.
4. rangers would have been allowed to remain in the spl if the vote had gone thier way. cant remember any other liquidated club allowed this facility
5. paltry fine to an about to be liquidated company regarding rangers use of EBT,s which they were found guilty of abusing, and knowingly doing so. yet brechin were thrown out of the scottish cup about 5 years ago for less.
6. no direct entry to gretna newco into the league or any hint of a vote for them to be in the spl.
7. ex rangers director who is now a director at the sfa who pr
[quote="happytim"]1. introduction of the play offs to allow 1 particular club a cusion if they fek up promotion.
2. livvy found for breaking the duel ownership rules. rangers allowed time for thier egm to go ahead before they got thier fine.
3.rangers newco allowed direct entry into the 4rth tier despite the rules saying they needed 3 years audited accounts which they didnt have. all other clubs who applied for entry into into the bottom tier had to have these accounts.
4. rangers would have been allowed to remain in the spl if the vote had gone thier way. cant remember any other liquidated club allowed this facility
5. paltry fine to an about to be liquidated company regarding rangers use of EBT,s which they were found guilty of abusing, and knowingly doing so. yet brechin were thrown out of the scottish cup about 5 years ago for less.
6. no direct entry to gretna newco into the league or any hint of a vote for them to be in the spl.
7. ex rangers di
Interesting how every news outlet from Jul/Aug 2012 has the licence of the old club being transfered to the new one.
But I'm not surprised this little detail is being airbrushed from the 3 year history.
:star: :star:
The arrogant wee tosser who sneaks on here at 4am needs some serious help, never seen anyone so detached from reality. This clown thinks a 3 year old club who are playing 6 playoffs to reach the big league is the biggest in scotland XD