Ooops sorry, my mistake, it's a Labour MP who's going to be spending four years at her Majesty's Pleasure. Like I keep saying, there's no difference between them, two cheeks of the same arse.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...for-four-years
Printable View
Ooops sorry, my mistake, it's a Labour MP who's going to be spending four years at her Majesty's Pleasure. Like I keep saying, there's no difference between them, two cheeks of the same arse.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...for-four-years
Sleaze? I think not mon ami, the man's a drug addict and a crook. I'm trying to remember the Tory candidate who failed to beat this coke head at that particular election. He must be one hell of a poor candidate do you reckon if he couldn't get past this horror bag? >:)
I rang an old mate of mine to get the scoop, he told me the CLP & PLP were all over this crook in around 2018. He was claiming "mental illness" according to my old mucker, he tells me his CLP thought he was just a "pi$$head". >:)
Might explain why there are so many wrong un's in Westminster...
Attachment 23470
It is a pity that his local labour mob didn't look more closely at who they were backing as a prospective MP, they could have saved a lot of trouble and also a lot of money which he fiddled and his payment as an MP ---it would appear that anyone can be a candidate if they say the right things. It is all very pathetic and typical of politics today.
I must admit to being surprised at this one Supersub6. I have personally been involved in 3 different CLP's on selection hearings and it's usually really bloody rigorous.
I have no idea how Sheffield ended up with this tool but then again look at Hancock. It's scary to think they have just awarded themselves yet another pay rise. :mad: