How, after spending £600 million, are Chelsea left without a proper striker and still starting Reuben Loftus-Cheek?
Printable View
How, after spending £600 million, are Chelsea left without a proper striker and still starting Reuben Loftus-Cheek?
Because they haven't got the set up and structure that Eddie Howe has set up here.
They are like the Chelski of old and the Liverpool of old and the Manure of old. Too much money to waste for their own good.
You only have to look at the billions those three clubs have wasted in the past by seeing a big name and thinking that's the answer without looking at how he's going to fit in with the team balance and the club structure.
You could build a total club with the money those clubs have wasted over the seasons. I only need give one example. How long did big name Carroll last at Liverpool and how much did they lose on him. Yet the player was a huge success here first time round and that was under the right circumstances.
It all comes down to the organisation.
Come on Leicester....
Maddison scores again! 2:1
3-1 now...get in
Brighton 1-0 up and only 3 points behind us as things stand
Brentford have equalized against Arsenal
Arsenal being held 1-1 at home by Brentford. ;D
spurs lose 4-1.... excellent result