https://www.skysports.com/football/n...emain-as-owner
Of course if you believe it then you're dumber than a very dumb thing.
Which i suspect Uefa are as it makes a mockery of their rules.
Printable View
https://www.skysports.com/football/n...emain-as-owner
Of course if you believe it then you're dumber than a very dumb thing.
Which i suspect Uefa are as it makes a mockery of their rules.
Yeah that's pretty much my view. I don't blame him to be honest.
I guess I'm of the view if olympiakos or forest were playing each other in the last game of the 1st round and a certain result was needed for one or both then you know it will happen. Uefas fault though.
Looking less likely it matters now anyway
Just read this elsewhere on socials and it raised a smile.
Quote:
I like the moment they cut to their fat chairman slumped across 2 seats with grease marks all down his marquee, sorry, shirt.
I also realised that their supporters don't understand football, presumably due to their mental incapacity. Every time a f*rest player goes down in the box, they scream for a penalty, regardless of why they went down. At one point Dewsbury Hall cleared the ball and 2 f*rest players kicked him, banged into each other and fell over. Cut straight to a six finger knuckle dragger in the crowd screaming at the ref that it was a clear penalty.
We may be a long way behind them on the pitch but I'm just pleased I'm not one of them.
I did like that they banned Gary Neville from the ground yesterday. If a few more clubs did that life would be much better for Sky subsctibers
Lol. You might find it superficially amusing, GP, as might I, but it’s a ridiculous precedent and all too typical (over) reaction, imo, to ban a pundit because you don’ t like their criticism.
Almost guarantees a home draw for Forest against Salford in one of next season’s cup competitions.;)
Why would making life for Sky subscribers be a plus? Isn't the money from Sky thats inflated footballers wages and resulted n games being arranged for Sky Tv's convenience and scheduling rather than fans a negative?
As RA rightly points out, banning journalists or media from anywhere on the basis of you don't like them or what they say (echoes of Trump here) then that's a negative for free speech and a dangerous precedent.
I thought you were making the argument on here that all views should be heard and not cancelled?