https://www.theguardian.com/football...rgency-meeting
I have to agree with Charnley, this is anti-competitive.
Their can be no justification for this.
https://www.theguardian.com/football...rgency-meeting
I have to agree with Charnley, this is anti-competitive.
Their can be no justification for this.
I’ve just posted the same (I’ll delete the duplicate thread)
Stooping to a new low
****s the lot of them.
They seem a little desperate don't they?
Anyone get the feeling this takeover won’t work out?
I don’t know but I’m becoming more incensed by the minute.
It’s definitely us against the world - well you know what - we won’t take this lying down we will fight all the way the grave.
Nothing to see here - call their bluff like Mikey did with CAT, they’ll crumble. They can make up, change and interpret league rules as much as they want but as soon as they’re challenged outside their comfort zone they’ll buckle. I’m any event, the new dudes on the block at Gallowgate will have so many independent business associates willing to lump on, it won’t matter.
You are right Bix. What can they do? Nothing. Citeh and Chelski spent obscene amounts and broke the rules season upon season without a murmur from the collective coven.
I can see our owners showing this lot up, and doing things correctly and with both dignity and purpose.
Man City sided with us so well done to them as for the rest they are just green eyed jealous losers
I don't know how this ban can remain in place permanently. Especially if Man City are allowed to be sponsored by Etihad Airways which is owned by the Abu Dhabi government