THE Ardley In/Out Thread [Multiple threads merged]

​Judging purely by “results”, with the word meaning “a thing that is caused or produced by something else; a consequence or outcome,” Neal Ardley, or indeed any other manager under the current circumstances, should have been fired a long time ago. In an honourable society however, he would have resigned. Despite the dire conditions brought about by Covid we still have a club thanks to the Reedtz family and on paper, and from what I have seen so far, we appear to have a very good squad; one that could easily win promotion if it had a sense of direction, purpose and solid leadership. We don’t need and cannot afford endless experimentation in the hope that things will go right on the pitch sometime in the distant future. It is abundantly clear that the manager cannot inspire and lead our teams. I am fully aware of the pitfalls of managerial roundabouts but unless he is replaced soon we will go into oblivion with the usual excuses. If I were daddy Reedtz I would be saying to my boys, “Listen lads. I admire your ambition, drive and loyalty, but your man’s time is up. He’s had his chances and you need fresh blood, or else”. Gamblers compound their losses by gambling more and more in the hope of winning and we cannot allow the manager to gamble our club away.

So you don't think we'll do very well this season?

Considering the financial consequences of sacking a manager with a year left on his contract and replacing him with someone better at a time when its uncertain that clubs can survive in the long term I'm not convinced this is the advice "Daddy Reedtz" would be offering to his boys.

From a footballing perspective I agree that your comments may hold some merit but I see no advantage in dumping him at this stage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ncfcog

Considering the financial consequences of sacking a manager with a year left on his contract and replacing him with someone better at a time when its uncertain that clubs can survive in the long term I'm not convinced this is the advice "Daddy Reedtz" would be offering to his boys.

From a footballing perspective I agree that your comments may hold some merit but I see no advantage in dumping him at this stage.

---

This

Yep sacking a manager in the current climate would be insane. I’ve yet to be convinced that we’ve got that great a squad either, I certainly doubt it’s better than last season.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Supporter since 1951

unless he is replaced soon we will go into oblivion with the usual excuses. y.

---

Can't imagine the owners will allow him to take us into oblivion, but I can see them holding out until January/February by which time this season will be a write-off, promotion wise. The owners will bring success eventually but they are almost certainly going to have shut the door once and for all on a very dark and embarrassing period of our history and make their first managerial appointment before that happens.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by upthemaggies

Can't imagine the owners will allow him to take us into oblivion, but I can see them holding out until January/February by which time this season will be a write-off, promotion wise. The owners will bring success eventually but they are almost certainly going to have shut the door once and for all on a very dark and embarrassing period of our history and make their first managerial appointment before that happens.

---

30th of Jan will be exactly half way in the league if it gets to start on 3rd Oct. If we are top 10 or within a few points of the play off places at that point no way they will sack him, we would have to be well off the pace for that to happen, and I really don't expect that to be the case. You may have to wait the whole season out to get your wish!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BigFatPie

Yep sacking a manager in the current climate would be insane. I’ve yet to be convinced that we’ve got that great a squad either, I certainly doubt it’s better than last season.

---

It's all moot anyrode, Reedtz Employment won't sack him. They don't appear to me to be the sacking type.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Supporter since 1951

Judging purely by “results”, with the word meaning “a thing that is caused or produced by something else; a consequence or outcome,” Neal Ardley, or indeed any other manager under the current circumstances, should have been fired a long time ago. In an honourable society however, he would have resigned. Despite the dire conditions brought about by Covid we still have a club thanks to the Reedtz family and on paper, and from what I have seen so far, we appear to have a very good squad; one that could easily win promotion if it had a sense of direction, purpose and solid leadership. We don’t need and cannot afford endless experimentation in the hope that things will go right on the pitch sometime in the distant future. It is abundantly clear that the manager cannot inspire and lead our teams. I am fully aware of the pitfalls of managerial roundabouts but unless he is replaced soon we will go into oblivion with the usual excuses. If I were daddy Reedtz I would be saying to my boys, “Listen lads. I admire your ambition, drive and loyalty, but your man’s time is up. He’s had his chances and you need fresh blood, or else”. Gamblers compound their losses by gambling more and more in the hope of winning and we cannot allow the manager to gamble our club away.

---

Bloody hell! The season hasn't even started yet. This must be some kind of record!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by countygump

It's all moot anyrode, Reedtz Employment won't sack him. They don't appear to me to be the sacking type.

---

No, they don’t. If they were going to get rid it would have been after Wem-ber-lee.