I don't think he's worth that to be honest but he'll add creativity to an already outstanding City team.
Can't see them making a move for Kane too (this window anyway)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/58032330
Printable View
I don't think he's worth that to be honest but he'll add creativity to an already outstanding City team.
Can't see them making a move for Kane too (this window anyway)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/58032330
I think they might do both still.
I really don't think he's worth £100 million but really he is worth what City want to pay for him.
He'll certainly make them more impressive if he moves there.
If they do sign Grealish and Kane they'll have a ridiculous array of talent
Grealish is a diving, whinging little bastard...but...an absolutely fantastic player.
He'd earn my undying respect, though, if he decided to stay at Villa and in that respect, I have sympathy for their fans. We know exactly what it's like to have such a talented local lad move on because they can't fulfil their ambitions at the club they support.
Much as I don't blame them, I've never fully forgiven Beardsley, Gascgoine and Waddle for leaving.
Not that Waddle supported us but you know what I mean.
He is a decent player.
But for some reason I see a fat David Beckham with about 80% of his ability.
100 mill, don't make me laugh. 40 at best.
I think Guardiola will improve him as a player and he'll be playing alongside better players but, aye...£100 million?
Or, to put it another way...a tenth of a billion.
Looks like Kane is going to try and force through a move to City:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/58053653
I genuienly didn't think he'd have the balls to pull a move like that.