He has been recalled to cover an injury to one of Hulls centre backs - as it is agreed in the loan deal.
It's a comedy and I'm not laughing - yes we will miss him, he's been a rock (even Rams can't deny that)
January is a nemesis to Forest![]()
Seems he's left Forest and gone back to Hull. I thought Forest had bought him but it seems not. They could miss him if he's away for a long period.
He has been recalled to cover an injury to one of Hulls centre backs - as it is agreed in the loan deal.
It's a comedy and I'm not laughing - yes we will miss him, he's been a rock (even Rams can't deny that)
January is a nemesis to Forest![]()
I think its more that Hull want to sell him and there are clubs willing to pay, whilst Forest for all their millions werent and wanted him to remain on loan!!
Serves them right the tight ****s!!
It comes just a week after revealing that Forest had agreed to stump up around £1m to take the defender to the City Ground at the end of the season following a successful loan period there.Originally Posted by swaledale
I think he should stick to cricket to be honest
So your lot are so dim that they pay a million for a loan deal which has a recall clause? This has been bubbling around for weeks with Hull sources saying publicly there is a lot of interest in Hobbs and if Forest think they are getting him on loan cheap their mistaken!
More to this than meets the eye!!
If you think that is the truth then it is you who are dim. Hull have foregone the million in order to recall Jack Hobbs to cover for an injured player.Originally Posted by swaledale
If you think that is the truth then it is you who are dim. Hull have foregone the million in order to recall Jack Hobbs to cover for an injured player.[/quote]Originally Posted by Akwesasne
Sounds to me like Forest have been shafted massively by this. Either they now think he is worth more than they agreed with Forest or he has done sufficiently well that they genuinely don't want to lose him at the moment.
This is a pitfall with loans - we used it to our advantage when we were expected to sign Nathan Ellington at the end of his season long loan - as I recall we decided not to, even though there was no fee invol
I thought awks was banned from footy mad?
Only in the same way as southernram22 is banned from footy mad.![]()