ffs start derbyshire tomorrow and give him a chance...

[millersontour]

im getting fed up now with all the stop and starting of the squad ..lets start with OUR striker tomorrow and give the kida chance.

[Brin]

You may get your wish pal...can't see him being any worse as at the mo no one can score but the main thing is if he does play tomorrow from the off and nothing comes of it who gets the flack...him or the Gaffer ?


Yes on paper he is suppose to have the most experience ...can you see him and Sammon being a hit?

Whatever team the Gaffer roles out we simply need to let them know where are there right behind them...

[avondalemiller]

yip, try him with Sammon up front,especially if Gudjohansson and Heskey start. Be a bit concerned if they play 5 across the middle, we could get over run there then. We'll have to match them up, system wise.

[djsld]

yip, try him with Sammon up front,especially if Gudjohansson and Heskey start. Be a bit concerned if they play 5 across the middle, we could get over run there then. We'll have to match them up, system wise.

According to yesterday's papers, Heskey is a doubt but Gudjohansson wil play.

According to Russell Grant he'll be in Arnies pocket all night.

[millertop]

I hate one up front.

Derbyshire should be starting but so should Bowery, both should have been given a run of games up front but its not going to happen now is it IMO.

[Mattthemiller157]

I hate one up front.

Derbyshire should be starting but so should Bowery, both should have been given a run of games up front but its not going to happen now is it IMO.

Derbyshire "should be starting?" Why? He's not done anything to warrant a place in the side.

He had a run of games at the start of the season and hasn't scored a league goal. He's had far too many chances, and wasted them all.

You can't just say 'give him a chance', when he's already had more than most signings Evans brings in. He should count himself lucky if he's not at Bury by Feb 4th.

[millertop]

I hate one up front.

Derbyshire should be starting but so should Bowery, both should have been given a run of games up front but its not going to happen now is it IMO.

Derbyshire "should be starting?" Why? He's not done anything to warrant a place in the side.

He had a run of games at the start of the season and hasn't scored a league goal. He's had far too many chances, and wasted them all.

You can't just say 'give him a chance', when he's already had more than most signings Evans brings in. He should count himself lucky if he's not at Bury by Feb 4th.[/quote]

Derbyshire had a run of games? Clearly I'm looking at the wrong player then

There's been plenty on here about why he should be given a run of games.

[Millerboy08]

I hate one up front.

Derbyshire should be starting but so should Bowery, both should have been given a run of games up front but its not going to happen now is it IMO.

Derbyshire "should be starting?" Why? He's not done anything to warrant a place in the side.

He had a run of games at the start of the season and hasn't scored a league
goal. He's had far too many chances, and wasted them all.

You can't just say 'give him a chance', when he's already had more than most signings Evans brings in. He should count himself lucky if he's not at Bury by Feb 4th.[/quote]

Derbyshire had a run of games? Clearly I'm looking at the wrong player then

There's been plenty on here about why he should be given a run of games.[/quote]


Because love it or hate it atm he is the best option of scoring we have

[Mattthemiller157]

I hate one up front.

Derbyshire should be starting but so should Bowery, both should have been given a run of games up front but its not going to happen now is it IMO.

Derbyshire "should be starting?" Why? He's not done anything to warrant a place in the side.

He had a run of games at the start of the season and hasn't scored a league
goal. He's had far too many chances, and wasted them all.

You can't just say 'give him a chance', when he's already had more than most signings Evans brings in. He should count himself lucky if he's not at Bury by Feb 4th.[/quote]

Derbyshire had a run of games? Clearly I'm looking at the wrong player then

There's been plenty on here about why he should be given a run of games.[/quote]


Because love it or hate it atm he is the best option of

[Mattthemiller157]

Derbyshire had a run of games? Clearly I'm looking at the wrong player then

There's been plenty on here about why he should be given a run of games.

I assumed you'd watched the wrong player. 14 games, 0 goals.

I've never seen or heard a comment on here, Twitter or down the pub of a valid reason why we're wasting a big wage on him to produce nothing.

Please give me the overview of 1 or 2 of the comments.