What no happy clappy ratings for MKD?

[AngryRam]

Come on fella's, this one should be interesting.
The lower numbers are to the left on your keyboards..

[ellafella]

Come on fella's, this one should be interesting.
The lower numbers are to the left on your keyboards..

Who are these "happy clappers" that you keep mentioning Angry?
And how about some "Angry Ratings"?

[Baba]

Carson - 8
Christie - 7
Warnock - 7
Keogh - 7
Shackell - 7
Johnson - 6
Butterfield - 5
Baird - 4
Russell - 6
Ince - 7
Martin - 4

[AngryRam]

Come on fella's, this one should be interesting.
The lower numbers are to the left on your keyboards..

Who are these "happy clappers" that you keep mentioning Angry?
And how about some "Angry Ratings"?

[/quote]

Yourself and young D_D my good man.. The Angrymeister is not known for marking out of 10 but if you want something I would go for the following:

Carson 8/10 - Saved (excuse the pun) the day.
Christie 5/10 - Poor in the final third and someone please introduce him to Ince.
Keogh 7/10 - Did okay but needs more composure and awareness. Often heads the ball when a step back and bring it down on your chest is a better option.
Shackell 7/10 - Calm but still needs to work on his passing.
Warnock 3/10 - Apart from one cross inefffectual going forward.
Baird 1/10 - Did nothing
Johnson 6/10 - Solid and took his goal well.
Butterfield 5/10 - Need more

[wristslasher_909]

Expectations have gone haywire again Angry

[Beardyram]

When we have 5 attack minded players whose job is to create and score then surely rating Warnock, Baird and Christie low because of their inability to create is harsh. Their first job is to defend which they did well enough. Baird is in the team purely to protect the two centre halves from players running through the middle, he did that well in my opinion, he is not there to be a creative attacking force, so to rate him on that is a little unfair.

[Baba]

5 out of 10 for Ince who set up and scored 2 of our 3 goals and was ultimately the difference between the 2 sides... nice one...

[mistaram]

Angry I have to agree with your scoring except for Butterfield I would have given him 3 and that's being generous Someone behind me at the match said Butterfield had only touch the 10 times in the first half that's poor for a midfielder Its well known you don't like Christie but don't blame him for Inces inefficiencies Whats a full back supposed to do with a winger who hates having the ball on his right foot Opposing defenders are just stopping him coming inside so easy to mark but not Christies fault

[blackandwhite56]

When we have 5 attack minded players whose job is to create and score then surely rating Warnock, Baird and Christie low because of their inability to create is harsh. Their first job is to defend which they did well enough. Baird is in the team purely to protect the two centre halves from players running through the middle, he did that well in my opinion, he is not there to be a creative attacking force, so to rate him on that is a little unfair.

Warnock's horrible backpass.

He is slow, no better than Forsyth in defence and at least Forsyth gets forward a lot. Warnock's cross for the goal was on a very rare forward position for him.He ain't the future ( or the present). Angry's rating spot on!

[AngryRam]

5 out of 10 for Ince who set up and scored 2 of our 3 goals and was ultimately the difference between the 2 sides... nice one...

Oh so I should have given him a 9 then? Is the game only 3 mins long?
Yes, nice movement for the first but more credit to Hendrick for the one decent pass of the game.. The second he made himself and took well but I would expect that.
Generally very average, nothing special hence the average mark.