I'd go with the Forte/Ameobi combination. Can't see many other options.
Stead’s figures last season were a bit misleading.
He scored 9 in his first 10 appearances, and 5 in his last 26.
That included only 1 in his last 11 games of the season.
Can someone explain to me why we never play Forte up front with either Ameobi or Stead? I'm convinced there's potential for a decent partnership with either of those combinations.
I'd go with the Forte/Ameobi combination. Can't see many other options.
Stead’s figures last season were a bit misleading.
He scored 9 in his first 10 appearances, and 5 in his last 26.
That included only 1 in his last 11 games of the season.
Stead should never have been re-signed. It's a waste of significant wage.
As others have said, Stead isn't an ideal partner for Ameobi, because neither of them offers any pace. We need a pacey second striker to play alongside Shola.
If Ameobi is unavailable we've got real problems, because Stead is actually a pretty awful target man who has a surprisingly poor first touch for a former Premiership player and does not relish the physical battle with centre-halves. Until Ameobi arrived to do the target man job properly, it became a running joke that Stead would crumple time and again under challenge from defenders, weakly crying for free-kicks.
I remember Jon Stead in his heyday playing for Huddersfield and in those days he was sharper and pacier. He has always had a good finishing instinct, and that still remains to a degree, but the rest of his game is greatly diminished. Nolan has made a mistake not releasing him, because Stead could happily have finished his career in the States, and we could have invested in a quality, pacey young striker to play alongside Ameobi, and perhaps recruited another proper target man as well. As things stand, we'll be relying on Alan Smith as back-up target man, which is pitiful.
Last edited by jackal2; 06-08-2017 at 12:02 AM.
I'd try putting him in the match day squad for starters, then if he makes it on to the pitch at all, I'd try him up front.
Just a thought, although if Jones persists with today's kind of performance perhaps left back could be his new calling.
I really don't know what Nolan has against him, he abused him last season playing him on the wing and then picking the lad from West Brom whose name I can't even remember ahead of him.
He may have lost a bit of pace, may not be prolific, but he runs his socks off, doesn't bottle out a tackle and managed eleven goals last season with very little service, and has to be worth a place on the bench ahead of Smith or Saunders who I believe managed a grand total of one goal between them last season.
Forte was never the player some fans thought we were getting. He flattered to deceive on loan to us on a couple of occasions but his overall career record is average at best. However, Optipez is basically right that he's still by far the best option we've got as a striker to play off Shola, and certainly better as a striker than a winger. Between them they should have enough to do okay in this division in the short-term.
Hardy needs to butt out if so, knows nothing about the game. Leave it to KN as it's blatantly obvious with Stead and Ameobi there's a lack of pace which Forte provides if he's on song.
Saunders being on the bench instead of Forte, and Hewitt and Walker starting in midfield were all poor selections. Obviously unless injuries were involved.
Things can only get better?
There are a lot of valid questions to be asked, but let's not get carried away. I don't think Alan Hardy would try to directly influence team selection, and I don't think Kevin Nolan would let him. In my view, the majority of the recruitment and retention during the summer has been questionable and I think the responsibility for that lies squarely with the manager. If anything, Hardy has trusted his judgement too much. We saw last season that Kevin Nolan is a good motivator who can lift a group of players, but the jury is still out on whether he is a good judge of players.