Having been given a bit of a roasting yesterday for my Match Ratings, I thought I'd waste an hour composing a Summary table of those that expressed an opinion on the thread yesterday:
In order of those that posted, Tarkers, ComeOnYouStylish, Optipez, BFP and Slack
Collin 7.5 6.5 7 7 7
Toots 8 7.5 7.5 8 8
Duffy 7.5 6.5 7 6 7
Brisley 7.5 7 7 6 7
Jones 8 6.5 7 5 7
Grant 8 7 7 8 8
Yates 8 7 7 7 8.5
Milsom 7.5 7 7.5 7 7
Hawk 8 7.5 7 9 7
Stead 7 7.5 8 8 8
Forte 8 6.5 7 8 7
Dicko 7.5 6.5 6.5
Hewitt 7.5 6.5 6.5
Conclusion -
Defence - I appear to have rated our back 5 TOO highly (apart from Toots)......I admit they had a dodgy first 20 minutes but after the sending-off were they ever tested again?
Midfield - We broadly agree. The only major difference is that both BFP and myself gave Hawk, MOM, and higher marks
Attack - This appears to be the main argument. I dislike Stead's "Stick-insect on ice" routine and "oh ref, he pushed me again", yet I still gave him a 7 (the max was three 8s).....plus I also rate Forte's work-rate and application running the channels and gave him an 8 compared to an average 7.25
Edit - There were spaces between the scores, for easier viewing, when I typed this.......the site has compressed it....grrrr
Reply With Quote