Will Hughes

[army88]

Linked again today us and palarce who’ve apparently offered 5 million.
Personally for me I’d like this to happen he’s aggressive - competitive and has a pass in his locker as well .

This boy was on his way to Barcelona before a serious injury flummoxed that.

We should buy him at decent money he’d be a good recruit , proven premier league player still young enough to offer us value for money , everything Burnley want apparently- Make it happen please ?

[Altobelli]

I'd prefer the arsenal lad with the double barrel name, I know, but I'm just wanting something we cannot have.

Hughes reminds me of another Hendrick Army

[sinkov]

If both clubs meet the asking price it will be down to the player, and I cannot for the life of me think of any reason why Hughes would prefer us to Palace. Except of course if we offer him a lot more money, and we aren't going to do that, so I expect he's on his way to Palace.

[army88]

I'd prefer the arsenal lad with the double barrel name, I know, but I'm just wanting something we cannot have.

Hughes reminds me of another Hendrick Army

Hes Far superior footballer to hendrick Alto , as it stands at minute I’d take him back as well at least he’s mobile and does a job.

We’re in a worse state without hendrick as average a footballer he was.

[sinkov]

Hes Far superior footballer to hendrick Alto , as it stands at minute I’d take him back as well at least he’s mobile and does a job.

We’re in a worse state without hendrick as average a footballer he was.

Bloody hell army, you're scraping the barrel there mate. Newcastle are in as bad a state as us, but since Jeff got sent off six months ago on February 6th, Bruce has only started him in just the one game. If he isn't good enough for them he isn't good enough for us, we need better than Newcastle rejects to get us out of the hole we're in.

[army88]

My point Sinkov was he’s a mobile body who got up and down the pitch , plus he was utility as in he play where asked to do so.
I accept he’s not a gifted footballer - here’s a question Lennon or Hendrick be honest.

[ClaretinBudapest]

My point Sinkov was he’s a mobile body who got up and down the pitch , plus he was utility as in he play where asked to do so.
I accept he’s not a gifted footballer - here’s a question Lennon or Hendrick be honest.

I remember watching him when we played Watford and thinking he would be ideal for us.Our midfield needs more than just one replacement though.
So far evolution has brought us Hennessy on a free, like for like with Gibson, maybe Aaron Lennon and a new groundsman.Definitely not revolution.
I am convinced SD is waiting until the end of the window and if there are no serious additions then he will not sign and I for one, would not blame him.

[army88]

I remember watching him when we played Watford and thinking he would be ideal for us.Our midfield needs more than just one replacement though.
So far evolution has brought us Hennessy on a free, like for like with Gibson, maybe Aaron Lennon and a new groundsman.Definitely not revolution.
I am convinced SD is waiting until the end of the window and if there are no serious additions then he will not sign and I for one, would not blame him.

The last time he played against us at the turf CIB he started in a deeper role and at half time they changed it around and pushed him into a number 10 behind front line , he ripped us to shreds , winning ball and threading passes through our midfield and defence , we still won the game as it happens but he showed what a classy footballer he is , don’t know if any highlights available but check it out if there are he’s definitely what we need.

[sinkov]

My point Sinkov was he’s a mobile body who got up and down the pitch , plus he was utility as in he play where asked to do so.
I accept he’s not a gifted footballer - here’s a question Lennon or Hendrick be honest.

The obvious answer is neither army, but if you put a gun to my head I'd say Lennon. I really do not like Hendrick, sure he's a trier, but imo he's a liability, he could easily lose you a game. Lennon is unlikely ever to win us a game, but tucked away on the wing I don't think he's going to lose us one either. I can't say the same about our Jeff.

Anyway you've dropped me right in it now army, Sub is President of the Jeff Hendrick Appreciation Society, when he reads this he's going to be right on my case. I'm in serious trouble.

[army88]

The obvious answer is neither army, but if you put a gun to my head I'd say Lennon. I really do not like Hendrick, sure he's a trier, but imo he's a liability, he could easily lose you a game. Lennon is unlikely ever to win us a game, but tucked away on the wing I don't think he's going to lose us one either. I can't say the same about our Jeff.

Anyway you've dropped me right in it now army, Sub is President of the Jeff Hendrick Appreciation Society, when he reads this he's going to be right on my case. I'm in serious trouble.

Hey everyone has an opinion Sinkov , my only issue in response would be we have too many players who aren’t going to win us a game , what I’d call safe players (sean may be a reason for that tbh in his set up - shape etc ).

Unlike sub I’m not a massive hendrick fan however in his defence he was one of as named above , won’t set the world on fire but always gave his best and tried , at the moment we’re seriously short of bodies who can do any sort of job never mind win / change games for us