Premier League - Manchester United - Who Dropped a Bo**ack with Player Signing.

[Ericsladkilnhurst]

Premier League - Manchester United - Who Dropped a Bo**ack with Player Signing.

Reported Manchester United paid over £50m for goalkeeper Andre Onana from Inter Milan.

Turns out Inter Milans original valuation for the player was £6m, reported after information
leaked out by Inter Milans sporting director, saying the club were prepared to accept £6m.

But however Manchester United e-mailed an offer over £50m for Andre Onana, which was
a big shock to the hierarchy at Inter Milan.
So the club snatched their hand off.

[CAMiller]

What's your source on this ELK? No doubt he looks a poor buy but in a market where GKs are regularly signing for 30m+ it's unlikely Inter would value one that had just played in a Champions League final at 6m. That's less than most Miller's value Viktor at.

[Lolmorgan]

Man Utd's opening bid for Andre Onana totalled £38.5m (€45m) but Inter Milan value the goalkeeper at £51m (€60m); clubs are working to find a compromise; the 27-year-old former Cameroon international joined Inter on a five-year deal from Ajax last summer.6millions Onanas Net Worth.

[Ericsladkilnhurst]

What's your source on this ELK? No doubt he looks a poor buy but in a market where GKs are regularly signing for 30m+ it's unlikely Inter would value one that had just played in a Champions League final at 6m. That's less than most Miller's value Viktor at.

Football Insider was the source CAMiller.

If Inter Milan bought the player for £6m from Ajax, this is where the valuation came from.

[CAMiller]

Football Insider was the source CAMiller.

If Inter Milan bought the player for £6m from Ajax, this is where the valuation came from.

He signed on a free from Ajax. As Lol reports, 6m is his net worth (money in his bank account/properties etc.) not his transfer worth.

[Ericsladkilnhurst]

He signed on a free from Ajax. As Lol reports, 6m is his net worth (money in his bank account/properties etc.) not his transfer worth.

What I meant was the source was saying the clubs valuation was £6m for the player, so I took it as that.

[CAMiller]

What I meant was the source was saying the clubs valuation was £6m for the player, so I took it as that.

I'd guess that the source is probably some rival fan, maybe Liverpool or City being a bit mischievous because of the way it's turned out. No way Inter would value him at 6m.

[Ericsladkilnhurst]

I'd guess that the source is probably some rival fan, maybe Liverpool or City being a bit mischievous because of the way it's turned out. No way Inter would value him at 6m.

Take the post down then please CAMiller