Reply With QuoteWe won't tolerate a portrait of a blood sports fan in our place. Isn't hunting illegal?
Hall Of Fame
Just reading reports that the government are setting some £8 million aside so that every public body might have a copy of the portrait of the new King. In this current economic climate especially how bloody tone-deaf can you get!! I'm sure-if this story is true-that Charles himself would not be impressed.
Now, I'm a bit of a history buff and I like quite a bit of our (at times rather daft ) heritage and traditions and I do think it only right that such public bodies have their portraits of the Queen replaced by one of the new monarch. But at this price?? Surely they could each fund a bloody copy of a framed portrait themselves. What are they, gold framed or something?
Moderator
We won't tolerate a portrait of a blood sports fan in our place. Isn't hunting illegal?
Moderator
His dad did a lot to make Tigers an endangered species and the grovellers then made him president of the WWF.
Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.
Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!
Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.
Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you
The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.
So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!
(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)
Posting Permissions