+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Sheff Weds Condemn 2

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    3,185

    Sheff Weds Condemn 2


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    5,314
    Saw this earlier. Utter scum.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Notts78 View Post
    Saw this earlier. Utter scum.
    No words to describe these people, but how does a club ban them for life in any practical way?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    18,918
    I don't understand this. Was this picked up by the TV cameras (and if so how did they know they were going to be shown at that moment) or have they asked somebody to take a photo of them holding up their phone with a picture of Bradley on it and then posted it themselves?

    Also, how are the people that have shared it and made it go viral any better? The family are the only people anybody should be concerned about and I don't see how bringing it to their attention is a positive thing.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    9,136
    Quote Originally Posted by upthemaggies View Post
    I don't understand this. Was this picked up by the TV cameras (and if so how did they know they were going to be shown at that moment) or have they asked somebody to take a photo of them holding up their phone with a picture of Bradley on it and then posted it themselves?

    Also, how are the people that have shared it and made it go viral any better? The family are the only people anybody should be concerned about and I don't see how bringing it to their attention is a positive thing.
    Looks photoshopped to me given the clarity of the picture and way fingers overlay but pic was I assume taken by an away Fan. How anyone could see it from the away end given the magnification required is questionable. Obviously in very very poor taste indeed if it happened, but there are much worse things that happen all the time. This gets in the media and there is then trial by social media. The people who shared it should have just gone to the cops if its a big deal to them. Doesn't appear on the surface that they did. So yeah I agree.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    13,571
    Quote Originally Posted by queenslandpie View Post
    Looks photoshopped to me given the clarity of the picture and way fingers overlay but pic was I assume taken by an away Fan. How anyone could see it from the away end given the magnification required is questionable. Obviously in very very poor taste indeed if it happened, but there are much worse things that happen all the time. This gets in the media and there is then trial by social media. The people who shared it should have just gone to the cops if its a big deal to them. Doesn't appear on the surface that they did. So yeah I agree.
    Even if this is what it appears to be, whatever consequences these two face in terms of police action and lifetime bans will happen anyway - it doesn't need to be plastered everywhere. Another example of a story promoted more because it is interesting to the public rather than being in the public interest. It's about attracting clickbait and selling advertising, and it works, but that doesn't make it necessary.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    9,136
    Quote Originally Posted by jackal2 View Post
    Even if this is what it appears to be, whatever consequences these two face in terms of police action and lifetime bans will happen anyway - it doesn't need to be plastered everywhere. Another example of a story promoted more because it is interesting to the public rather than being in the public interest. It's about attracting clickbait and selling advertising, and it works, but that doesn't make it necessary.
    Yep. I have seen it a lot on Twitter / FB etc. but I would never dare to comment negatively like I did above as then I would be next so to speak. An example of control. Anyway I am sure it will all be sorted out.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,162
    Quote Originally Posted by jackal2 View Post
    Even if this is what it appears to be, whatever consequences these two face in terms of police action and lifetime bans will happen anyway - it doesn't need to be plastered everywhere. Another example of a story promoted more because it is interesting to the public rather than being in the public interest. It's about attracting clickbait and selling advertising, and it works, but that doesn't make it necessary.
    So why post about it on here then ? Of course people are interested in the story however disturbing, two men arrested on public decency charges in custody.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    13,571
    Quote Originally Posted by maddogslater View Post
    So why post about it on here then ? Of course people are interested in the story however disturbing, two men arrested on public decency charges in custody.
    Glad2BePie posted the story actually, but I doubt that us commenting on it on here (now it's out there) will give greater publicity to the perpetrators or cause more distress to the family. The point being made is that this didn't need to be plastered all over the media in the first place. The story may be interesting to the public, but there's no significant 'public interest' served by publishing it, which is what the media always claim is their motive. Of course they're lying, it's all about clicks and advertising.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    9,976
    https://x.com/skynews/status/1708857...HIguMs7uVNF98Q

    The judge is considering jail time for at least one of these two people, which seems absolutely ludicrous to me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •