Thats goal keeper Jack Stevens according to a person. This isnt right, that all Cambridge players are unselectable, indeed thats how they got to be Cambridge players, being unselectable at their previous clubs.

And then to pick on them for being unselectable does not make sense, its like mocking the Elephant man, calling him an an elephant, how cruel is that?

Shame, shame shame. Being socialists, the club is supposed to ignore the non functioning and counsel those that are suffering, Jack Stevens and the fans.

And carry on picking Stevens, for gods sake, being non selected must be awful. Being sensitive, caring, empathic? FAILED.

Having said that, is being unselectable for Cambridge a whole new level of being unselectable? That we might be straying into Sean Marshall territory, where incompetance becomes a new science in itself, and draws the attention of health professionals, science proffesionals who recognise that this level of unselectability, incompetance, is making new boundaries.?

In Stevens case, he has spent all of his life, and being paid for it, a professional, trying to keep goal.

AND HE STILL CANT DO IT.

Certainly, brain scans are called for, examinations by the best psychiatrists, behavioural specialists, physiotherapists, doctors looking at hormones, iron levels, magnesium, his relationship with his father.

It is true that being unselectable for Cambridge is a new science, a different scale, compared for instance, being unselectable for Burton Albion, or Carlisle United.

Its like looking for a yeti in the forests of Wyoming......

And finding a whole team. No no no, thats me being cruel again.....

And finding Jack Stevens.