+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Sam Clucas

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,761

    Sam Clucas

    So he joined Oldham last week a non-league club, yet in the article below Evans says he left us because we couldn't afford him, he states he thinks he is a good player.

    So with a space in the squad and with Kelly not available over the last few months, why didn't we go back to him and bring him in, unless Oldham can pay more than us. For me this is another example of a story that just doesn't stand up.


    https://www.rotherhamadvertiser.co.u...united-4852528

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,827
    Evan’s is fluent in Bullsh!t.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2024
    Posts
    2,031
    Clucas was a sicknote replaced him with a slightly older same in Kelly.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    52,743
    Quote Originally Posted by RU66 View Post
    Clucas was a sicknote replaced him with a slightly older same in Kelly.
    ???? Come on fella, he played loads for us as stated by OJQ.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,761
    Quote Originally Posted by RU66 View Post
    Clucas was a sicknote replaced him with a slightly older same in Kelly.
    RU66 you miss the point being made.
    1. Evans rates the player
    2. Evans says he wanted too much money
    3. Evans says we never made him an offer
    4. He has joined a non-league team on a short-term contract, so clearly his financial expectations are still not at the championship level
    5. We have a space in our squad
    6. we lost a key midfielder for 2 months and we might suffer another injury in that area (e.g. mcWilliams has been out)
    7. We are told we operate a very, very good L1 budget

    add to that
    1. He takes a good set piece, that gives us options in an area that we have struggled
    2. He is calm on the ball and can pass
    3. He was already here and Evans says they had a good relationship in the short-time

    It has nothing to do whether you or I rate the player but the fact Evans does and his reason for him not being here, doesn't stack up to basic scrutiny. This is one of the reasons i dislike Evans because you cannot believe a word the man says, I would tolerate that if we were winning because the club is more important.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    52,743
    Quote Originally Posted by Derbymiller View Post
    RU66 you miss the point being made.
    1. Evans rates the player
    2. Evans says he wanted too much money
    3. Evans says we never made him an offer
    4. He has joined a non-league team on a short-term contract, so clearly his financial expectations are still not at the championship level
    5. We have a space in our squad
    6. we lost a key midfielder for 2 months and we might suffer another injury in that area (e.g. mcWilliams has been out)
    7. We are told we operate a very, very good L1 budget

    add to that
    1. He takes a good set piece, that gives us options in an area that we have struggled
    2. He is calm on the ball and can pass
    3. He was already here and Evans says they had a good relationship in the short-time

    It has nothing to do whether you or I rate the player but the fact Evans does and his reason for him not being here, doesn't stack up to basic scrutiny. This is one of the reasons i dislike Evans because you cannot believe a word the man says, I would tolerate that if we were winning because the club is more important.
    Derbs, some good observations there. I wonder how many are true?

    It makes you wonder what to believe Evans has to say these days. Having said that, number 7 is not proving itself to be true, or why would be full of a team of loanees, free agents and over 30's.

    Will we ever learn to be brave and go for more youthful players? I don't care if we went down that road and it took us two seasons to gel but here we are again. Raggett, Kelly, McWilliams and to top it all, our supposed saviour in Clark - Harris, all crocked and well before a dozen games! On top of that, Humphreys looks totally disinterested and is not the player he was showing last season.

    Finally, what is the secret cloak wrapped around Osong? Is he still here? Is he injured? I've not seen anything about this lad for weeks and he doesn't even make the bench now so what exactly is going off with him?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2024
    Posts
    292
    Quote Originally Posted by RU66 View Post
    Clucas was a sicknote replaced him with a slightly older same in Kelly.
    He played 32 games in the championship how does that make him a sicknote .Should have been offered a contract in div 1

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    52,743
    Same old bulls.hit coming out.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2024
    Posts
    2,031
    Quote Originally Posted by Brin View Post
    ???? Come on fella, he played loads for us as stated by OJQ.


    Never looked fully up to speed. That's why he's signed now for a non-league club.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    4,056
    Quote Originally Posted by RU66 View Post
    Never looked fully up to speed. That's why he's signed now for a non-league club.
    Never fully looked up to speed yet he arrived late if I remember was it September? Still played 32 games and at least looked as if he was up for the battle he’d piss all over our current midfield

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •